Change And Configuration Management DatabaseDatabase / datastore · Ibm

CVE-2012-0727

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-09-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.5, as used in SmartCloud Control Desk, Tivoli Asset Management for IT, Tivoli Service Request Manager, Maximo Service Desk, and Change and Configuration Management Database (CCMDB), allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.5 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors. The vulnerability affects multiple IBM products built on this platform including SmartCloud Control Desk, Tivoli Asset Management for IT, Tivoli Service Request Manager, Maximo Service Desk, and CCMDB.

MitigationApply IBM-supplied patches for this CVE. If patches are unavailable, audit affected code paths for dynamic SQL usage and implement parameterized queries or stored procedures with proper input validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Change And Configuration Management DatabaseDatabase / datastore
Affected:= 6.0= 7.0
Maximo Asset ManagementApplication
Affected:= 7.5.0.0
Maximo Service DeskApplication
Affected:= 6.2
Smartcloud Control DeskApplication
Affected:= 7.0
Tivoli Asset Management For ItApplication
Affected:= 6.0= 6.2= 7.0= 7.1= 7.2
Tivoli Service Request ManagerApplication
Affected:= 7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM product and version
    Access the Maximo/SmartCloud/Tivoli administration console or check system inventory to determine the exact product name and version number (e.g., Maximo Asset Management 7.5.0.0, CCMDB 6.0, etc.)
    Affected if The product matches any of these: CCMDB 6.0 or 7.0, Maximo Asset Management 7.5.0.0, Maximo Service Desk 6.2, SmartCloud Control Desk 7.0, Tivoli Asset Management for IT 6.0/6.2/7.0/7.1/7.2, or Tivoli Service Request Manager 7.0
  2. Verify remote authenticated access is enabled
    Check whether the web-based application interface (Maximo/CCMDB/SRManager) is accessible over network and user authentication is configured
    Affected if Remote/web access is enabled and user accounts exist in the system, allowing remote authenticated users to interact with the application
  3. Review application logs for suspicious SQL error messages
    Inspect system and application logs (typically in the logs directory of the Maximo installation) for SQL syntax errors, database errors, or unusual query patterns that may indicate SQL injection attempts
    Affected if SQL errors appear in logs without legitimate cause, suggesting the vulnerability is being triggered or exploited
  4. Audit database query patterns in application configuration
    If you have access to application configuration files or source code, search for dynamic SQL construction patterns (string concatenation used in SQL queries) without parameterized queries or stored procedures
    Affected if Dynamic SQL statements are built using user input without proper parameterization or input validation

Your environment is affected if it runs any of the listed product versions AND remote authenticated users can access the application interface, as this allows the SQL injection vector to be exploited.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM-supplied patches for this CVE. If patches are unavailable, audit affected code paths for dynamic SQL usage and implement parameterized queries or stored procedures with proper input validation.

Fix this in Change And Configuration Management Database Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0727 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0727 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data