Tivoli Directory ServerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2012-0743

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-04-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Tivoli Directory Server (TDS) 6.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a malformed LDAP paged search request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Tivoli Directory Server (TDS) versions 6.3 and earlier contain a vulnerability in the LDAP paged search functionality. Remote attackers can send specially crafted malformed LDAP paged search requests to trigger a daemon crash, resulting in denial of service.

MitigationUpgrade IBM Tivoli Directory Server to a version newer than 6.3, or apply any available patches. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict LDAP port exposure to trusted networks using firewall rules.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Tivoli Directory ServerApplication
Affected:<= 6.3.0= 3.2.2= 4.1= 5.2.0= 6.0= 6.0.0= 6.0.0.7= 6.0.0.8= 6.0.0.69= 6.1.0= 6.1.0.45= 6.1.0.46

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify IBM Tivoli Directory Server is installed
    Locate the TDS installation directory and check for the 'idssvr' or 'ldapux' process. Common paths: /opt/IBM/ldap, /opt/IBM/tds, or check with 'ps -ef | grep -i ibm' or 'ls -la /opt/IBM/'. On Windows, check Services for 'IBM Tivoli Directory Server'.
    Affected if IBM TDS binaries or processes are found on the system
  2. Determine the installed TDS version
    Run the version command specific to TDS. Common methods: 'idsversion' command from the bin directory, or check the product version file in the installation directory (e.g., /opt/IBM/ldap/version). On Windows, right-click the service and select Properties.
    Affected if The installed version matches any of these affected versions: 6.3.0 and earlier, 3.2.2, 4.1, 5.2.0, 6.0, 6.0.0, 6.0.0.7, 6.0.0.8, 6.0.0.69, 6.1.0, 6.1.0.45, or 6.1.0.46
  3. Confirm LDAP paged search is enabled
    Inspect the TDS configuration file (ibmslapd.conf or ibmslapd.conf) in the instance directory. Look for the 'allow paged search' directive or check via the administrative console (tdadmin). The feature is typically enabled by default in affected versions.
    Affected if LDAP paged search functionality is enabled in the configuration (this is the default state in vulnerable versions)
  4. Check LDAP service is listening
    Run 'netstat -an | grep 389' or 'netstat -an | grep 636' to verify the LDAP ports are open. Use 'ps' to confirm the LDAP server daemon (ibmdiradm, ibmslapd) is running.
    Affected if LDAP ports 389 or 636 are open and the TDS daemon is actively listening

The environment is affected if IBM Tivoli Directory Server is installed with a version matching 6.3.0 or any of the specific versions listed (3.2.2 through 6.1.0.46), and the LDAP service is running with paged search enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade IBM Tivoli Directory Server to a version newer than 6.3, or apply any available patches. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict LDAP port exposure to trusted networks using firewall rules.

Fix this in Tivoli Directory Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0743 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0743 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data