PyxmlApplication · Python

CVE-2012-0877

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
PyXML: Hash table collisions CPU usage Denial of Service

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

PyXML library contains a hash table collision vulnerability where specially crafted XML input with many attributes or elements that hash to the same value causes excessive CPU consumption, leading to denial of service. Attackers can exploit this by sending malicious XML documents that trigger O(n²) hash collision behavior.

MitigationUpgrade PyXML to a patched version, implement hash randomization via PYTHONHASHSEED, or migrate to a maintained XML library like lxml that includes protections against hash collision attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PyxmlApplication
Affected:all versions
Enterprise Virtualization HypervisorApplication
Affected:all versions
Enterprise LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 5.0= 6.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine if PyXML is installed
    Run 'python -c "import pyxml; print(pyxml.__file__)" 2>/dev/null' or 'python -c "import xml"; print(xml.__file__)" 2>/dev/null' to locate the xml module. On Red Hat systems, also check 'rpm -qa | grep -i pyxml' or 'rpm -qa | grep -i xml'
    Affected if PyXML (pyxml) or the xml module is present and being used for parsing XML
  2. Identify the Python version in use
    Run 'python --version' or 'python3 --version' to get the Python interpreter version
    Affected if Using Python 2.x (pre-3.3) which has weaker built-in hash randomization protections
  3. Check PYTHONHASHSEED environment variable
    Run 'echo $PYTHONHASHSEED' to see if hash randomization is enabled. A value of '0' disables randomization, while unset or a random numeric value enables it
    Affected if PYTHONHASHSEED is unset or set to 0, meaning hash tables are vulnerable to predictable collision attacks
  4. Verify if untrusted XML input is processed
    Inspect application code for xml parsers (xml.dom.minidom, xml.etree, xml.sax) processing external or user-submitted XML documents. Search for parser instantiation patterns in application logs or config
    Affected if Applications parse untrusted or externally-sourced XML documents using PyXML's xml module
  5. Check Red Hat Enterprise Linux version
    Run 'cat /etc/redhat-release' to identify the RHEL version
    Affected if Running RHEL 5.0 or 6.0 which bundle the vulnerable PyXML library

You are affected if PyXML or the xml module is installed and your environment processes untrusted XML input without hash randomization (PYTHONHASHSEED unset or 0) on vulnerable Python/RHEL versions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade PyXML to a patched version, implement hash randomization via PYTHONHASHSEED, or migrate to a maintained XML library like lxml that includes protections against hash collision attacks.

Fix this in Pyxml Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-0877 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-0877 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data