CVE-2012-10023
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in FreeFloat FTP Server version 1.0.0. The server fails to properly validate input passed to the USER command, allowing remote attackers to overwrite memory and potentially execute arbitrary code. The flaw is triggered by sending an overly long username string, which overflows the buffer allocated for user authentication.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in FreeFloat FTP Server v1.0.0 where the USER command fails to properly validate input length before copying the username string into a fixed-size buffer on the stack. By sending an overly long username string, an attacker can overflow the buffer, overwrite adjacent memory, and potentially execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the FTP service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify FreeFloat FTP Server is installedCheck for the presence of FreeFloat FTP Server executable (ftpserver.exe) in typical installation directories such as C:\Program Files\FreeFloat or C:\Program Files (x86)\FreeFloat, or search the filesystem for the executable.Affected if If the FreeFloat FTP Server executable exists on the system, proceed to version check.
-
Confirm installed version is 1.0Right-click the ftpserver.exe file, select Properties, and examine the Version tab for the product version. Alternatively, right-click the FreeFloat FTP Server entry in Windows Start Menu and select Properties to view the version information.Affected if If the version is listed as 1.0.0 or 1.0, the installed version matches the vulnerable release.
-
Verify FTP service is runningOpen Windows Services (services.msc), locate the FreeFloat FTP Server service, and check its Status column. Or run 'netstat -an | findstr :21' from command prompt to verify the FTP server is listening on port 21.Affected if If the service Status shows 'Running' or port 21 is listening, the vulnerable software is active and reachable.
-
Test USER command processingConnect to the FTP server using any FTP client (e.g., Windows command prompt: 'ftp <server_ip>') or telnet to port 21. When prompted for username, send an excessively long string (e.g., 200+ characters) using the USER command to observe if the server crashes or behaves unexpectedly.Affected if If the server accepts the long input without crashing or error, the buffer overflow vulnerability is present and exploitable.
A system is affected if FreeFloat FTP Server version 1.0 is installed and running, exposing the unpatched USER command buffer overflow to network attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedImplement strict input length validation on the USER command to ensure username data does not exceed the allocated buffer size before copying. Consider upgrading to a supported FTP server or implementing additional exploit mitigations such as stack canaries if patching the vulnerable software is not feasible.
- 1. Discontinue use of Freefloat FTP Server version 1.0 as it is unmaintained and no security patches are available.
- 2. Identify a currently supported FTP server solution (such as FileZilla Server, ProFTPD, or vsftpd) that receives regular security updates.
- 3. Install the replacement FTP server on a new system or migrate existing configurations to the new server.
- 4. Update firewall rules and access controls to point to the new FTP server.
- 5. If immediate mitigation is required while planning migration, restrict network access to the FTP server to trusted IP addresses only using firewall rules.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,592.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-10023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-10023 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data