CVE-2012-10044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMobileCartly version 1.0 contains an arbitrary file creation vulnerability in the savepage.php script. The application fails to perform authentication or authorization checks before invoking file_put_contents() on attacker-controlled input. An unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by sending crafted HTTP GET requests to savepage.php, specifying both the filename and content. This allows arbitrary file creation within the pages/ directory or any writable path on the server, allowing remote code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMobileCartly 1.0 contains an arbitrary file creation vulnerability in savepage.php where the application directly uses attacker-supplied input in file_put_contents() without any authentication or authorization checks. An unauthenticated attacker can send crafted HTTP GET requests specifying both filename and content parameters, enabling creation of arbitrary files (including PHP scripts) within the pages/ directory or other writable paths, leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm MobileCartly installation and versionLocate the MobileCartly installation directory and check for version indicators such as a version.php file, footer/copyright notices, or the main index.php page which typically displays the version numberAffected if The installed version is MobileCartly 1.0 or if the version cannot be determined but matches the product name
-
Verify savepage.php existsCheck for the presence of savepage.php in the web root or the scripts directory of the MobileCartly installationAffected if savepage.php exists and is accessible via the web server
-
Inspect savepage.php for vulnerable file_put_contents usageExamine the savepage.php source code and look for file_put_contents() or similar file write functions that directly use $_GET parameters for the filename or content arguments without validationAffected if The code uses $_GET['filename'] or similar GET parameters directly in file_put_contents() without sanitization or authentication checks
-
Check web server write permissionsVerify if the web server process has write permissions to any accessible web directories (such as the cache, pages, or main directory) where arbitrary files could be writtenAffected if The web server user has write access to directories accessible via the web application
-
Test unauthenticated access to savepage.phpAttempt to access savepage.php directly via HTTP without any authentication cookies or session tokensAffected if The script can be accessed and executed without authentication
The environment is affected if MobileCartly 1.0 is running with savepage.php accessible and the web server has write permissions to web-accessible directories, allowing unauthenticated attackers to create arbitrary files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement authentication and authorization checks before file operations, validate and sanitize filename/content inputs, restrict file creation to whitelisted paths, and remove the savepage.php endpoint from production if not required.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-10044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-10044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data