PuppetApplication

CVE-2012-1053

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-05-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The change_user method in the SUIDManager (lib/puppet/util/suidmanager.rb) in Puppet 2.6.x before 2.6.14 and 2.7.x before 2.7.11, and Puppet Enterprise (PE) Users 1.0, 1.1, 1.2.x, 2.0.x before 2.0.3 does not properly manage group privileges, which allows local users to gain privileges via vectors related to (1) the change_user not dropping supplementary groups in certain conditions, (2) changes to the eguid without associated changes to the egid, or (3) the addition of the real gid to supplementary groups.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The SUIDManager's change_user method in Puppet versions 2.6.x before 2.6.14 and 2.7.x before 2.7.11 fails to properly manage group privileges, allowing local users to gain privileges through three vectors: not dropping supplementary groups, changing eguid without egid, and improperly adding the real gid to supplementary groups.

MitigationUpgrade Puppet to version 2.6.14 or 2.7.11 or later (or Puppet Enterprise to 2.0.3+). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict local access to systems running Puppet and review SUIDManager usage.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
PuppetApplication
Affected:= 2.6.0= 2.6.1= 2.6.2= 2.6.3= 2.6.4= 2.6.5= 2.6.6= 2.6.7= 2.6.8= 2.6.9= 2.6.10= 2.6.11
PuppetApplication
Affected:= 2.7.0= 2.7.1
Puppet EnterpriseApplication
Affected:= 1.2.0= 1.2.1= 1.2.2= 1.2.3= 1.2.4= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.0.2
Puppet Enterprise UsersApplication
Affected:= 1.0= 1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Puppet installation type and version
    Run 'puppet --version' for open-source Puppet or check '/opt/puppet/bin/puppet --version' for Puppet Enterprise to determine the exact version installed
    Affected if The installed version is 2.6.0 through 2.6.11, or 2.7.0-2.7.1 for open-source; or 1.2.0-1.2.4 or 2.0.0-2.0.2 for Puppet Enterprise; or 1.0-1.1 for Puppet Enterprise Users
  2. Locate SUIDManager module
    Search for the SUIDManager file in the Puppet lib directory: 'find /usr -name suidmanager.rb 2>/dev/null' or check the puppet lib path returned by 'puppet --configprint libdir'
    Affected if The SUIDManager module exists on the system, indicating this feature is available for use
  3. Verify if SUIDManager is being used
    Check Puppet manifests for 'suidmanager' resource usage: 'grep -r "suidmanager" /etc/puppet/manifests/' or review any custom modules that manage suid/sgid binaries
    Affected if Puppet is actively managing suid/sgid binaries via SUIDManager, allowing the privilege escalation vectors to be triggered
  4. Check if Puppet runs with elevated privileges
    Review cron jobs, init scripts, or service configurations for Puppet running as root: 'ps aux | grep puppet' and check '/etc/sysconfig/puppet' or '/etc/puppet/puppet.conf' for user settings
    Affected if Puppet runs as root or with SUID bits set, which enables the group privilege management flaw to be exploited

You are affected if Puppet or Puppet Enterprise version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND SUIDManager is actively managing suid/sgid binaries on the system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Puppet to version 2.6.14 or 2.7.11 or later (or Puppet Enterprise to 2.0.3+). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict local access to systems running Puppet and review SUIDManager usage.

Fix this in Puppet Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,970
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1053 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1053 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data