Debian LinuxOperating system · Debian

CVE-2012-1115

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-12-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in LDAP Account Manager (LAM) Pro 3.6 in the export, add_value_form, and dn parameters to cmd.php.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

LDAP Account Manager Pro 3.6 contains a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in cmd.php. The 'export', 'add_value_form', and 'dn' parameters do not properly sanitize user input before reflecting it back in the HTTP response, allowing injection of arbitrary JavaScript code.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'export', 'add_value_form', and 'dn' parameters in cmd.php. Use context-appropriate encoding (HTML entity encoding for displayed content) and consider implementing Content Security Policy headers.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 8.0= 9.0
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 16= 17= 18
Ldap Account ManagerApplication
Affected:= 3.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify LDAP Account Manager installation
    Locate the LAM installation on the system. Common paths include /usr/share/lam, /var/www/html/lam, or a custom web root directory. Check for the presence of cmd.php in the web-accessible directory.
    Affected if cmd.php exists in the LAM web directory and the application is running LDAP Account Manager version 3.6
  2. Determine the installed LAM version
    Check the version information file in the LAM installation directory. This is typically found in a version.php file, a README, or the main index file. Compare the version number to the affected range.
    Affected if The installed version is LDAP Account Manager 3.6 exactly, as specified in the affected products
  3. Check if LAM is installed via system package manager
    For Debian systems, run: dpkg -l | grep ldap-account-manager. For Fedora systems, run: rpm -qa | grep ldap-account-manager. This identifies if LAM was installed through system packages.
    Affected if The package version matches 3.6 on Fedora 16, 17, or 18, or on Debian 8.0 or 9.0
  4. Inspect HTTP handling for vulnerable parameters
    Review the LAM configuration and access logs to determine if the application processes user input through the cmd.php script using the 'export', 'add_value_form', or 'dn' parameters.
    Affected if The application processes these parameters without input validation, indicating the XSS vulnerability is present

A system is affected if LDAP Account Manager version 3.6 is installed and the cmd.php script is accessible, as the reflected XSS vulnerability exists in the handling of the 'export', 'add_value_form', and 'dn' parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper input validation and output encoding for the 'export', 'add_value_form', and 'dn' parameters in cmd.php. Use context-appropriate encoding (HTML entity encoding for displayed content) and consider implementing Content Security Policy headers.

Fix this in Debian Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1115 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1115 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data