CVE-2012-1315
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMemory leak in the SIP inspection feature in the Zone-Based Firewall in Cisco IOS 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, and 15.2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption or device reload) via crafted transit SIP traffic, aka Bug ID CSCti46171.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA memory leak exists in the SIP inspection feature of Cisco IOS Zone-Based Firewall across versions 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, and 15.2. When specially crafted SIP traffic transits the firewall, the inspection engine fails to release allocated memory, causing progressive memory exhaustion that can lead to device reload or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.4= 15.0= 15.1= 15.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco IOS versionRun 'show version' command and note the IOS release number (e.g., 12.4(15)T, 15.1(4)M)Affected if The version begins with 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, or 15.2
-
Verify Zone-Based Firewall is activeRun 'show zone-pair security' and check if any zone-pairs exist with a security policyAffected if Zone-based firewall policies are configured and active
-
Confirm SIP inspection is enabledRun 'show policy-map type inspect zone-pair' or 'show inspect' and look for SIP inspection entries in the policyAffected if SIP inspection is configured on any zone-pair policy
-
Check for memory exhaustion indicatorsRun 'show memory summary' or 'show processes memory' and look for declining free memory or high memory usage by SIP inspection processesAffected if Free memory is consistently low or SIP-related processes consume excessive memory
-
Review SIP traffic statisticsRun 'show policy-map type inspect zone-pair' and examine SIP packet counts and drop statisticsAffected if High volume of SIP traffic is being processed through the inspected zone-pair
A device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS 12.4, 15.0, 15.1, or 15.2 AND has Zone-Based Firewall with SIP inspection enabled, and processes SIP traffic that could trigger the memory leak.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataDisable SIP inspection if not required, or apply the corresponding Cisco IOS software update. If SIP inspection is business-critical, implement transit rate limiting on SIP ports at upstream network edges to reduce exposure to malformed packets.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1315 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1315 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data