CVE-2012-1327
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unediteddot11t/t_if_dot11_hal_ath.c in Cisco IOS 12.3, 12.4, 15.0, and 15.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and reboot) via 802.11 wireless traffic, as demonstrated by a video call from Apple iOS 5.0 on an iPhone 4S, aka Bug ID CSCtt94391.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the 802.11 wireless Hardware Abstraction Layer (HAL) driver for Atheros chipsets (dot11t/t_if_dot11_hal_ath.c) in Cisco IOS versions 12.3, 12.4, 15.0, and 15.1 allows remote attackers to trigger an assertion failure via specially crafted 802.11 wireless frames, causing the affected device to reboot. The issue was demonstrated with Apple iOS 5.0 video call traffic from an iPhone 4S.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3= 12.4= 15.0= 15.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Cisco IOS versionUse the 'show version' command on the device console or via SSH to display the running IOS versionAffected if The displayed version is 12.3, 12.4, 15.0, or 15.1
-
Confirm wireless hardware is presentUse 'show hardware' or 'show interfaces' command to list installed interface cards and identify if wireless AIM, WIC, or access point modules are installedAffected if Wireless interface modules or built-in wireless hardware are present in the device
-
Verify Atheros chipset usageUse 'show controller wireless' or 'show diag' to identify the wireless chipset vendor. Atheros chipsets will be listed in the controller outputAffected if The wireless controller uses an Atheros chipset (ath, ARxxxx)
-
Check if 802.11 radio is configuredUse 'show run | include ap' or 'show wireless configuration' to see if any access point or radio configurations existAffected if Any 802.11a/b/g/n radio interfaces are configured or enabled on the device
The device is affected if it runs Cisco IOS 12.3, 12.4, 15.0, or 15.1, has Atheros-based wireless hardware, and has 802.11 radio interfaces enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco IOS security update corresponding to Bug ID CSCtt94391. If immediate patching is not possible, consider deploying wireless intrusion detection/prevention systems to filter malformed 802.11 frames and implement network access control to limit which devices can associate with affected access points.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1327 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1327 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data