CVE-2012-1335
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player T27 L through SP11 EP26, T27 LB through SP21 EP10, T27 LC before SP25 EP10, and T27 LD before SP32 CP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted WRF file, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-1336 and CVE-2012-1337.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow in Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted WRF file. The vulnerability affects multiple branches (L, LB, LC, LD) of T27 player at specific SP/EP versions. This is a client-side code execution vulnerability with high severity (CVSS 9.3).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 27.11.0, <= 27.11.26>= 27.21.0, <= 27.21.10>= 27.25.0, < 27.25.10>= 27.32.0, < 27.32.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the WebEx WRF Player versionOpen the WebEx Recording Format Player, access the About or Help menu, and locate the version information. Alternatively, check the installed program's version property in the Windows Add/Remove Programs or macOS Applications folder.Affected if The displayed version falls within any of these ranges: 27.11.0 to 27.11.26, 27.21.0 to 27.21.10, 27.25.0 to 27.25.9, or 27.32.0 to 27.32.0
-
Determine the T27 branch and service pack versionCheck the full version string which typically includes branch identifiers (L, LB, LC, LD) along with SP (Service Pack) and EP (Extension Pack) numbers. This information is usually visible in the player About dialog or the installer properties.Affected if The branch is L, LB, LC, or LD with an SP/EP version below the patched levels for that branch (for LC: below SP25 EP10; for LD: below SP32 CP1)
-
Verify if WRF file association is activeCheck if .wrf file type is registered to open with the WebEx WRF Player. On Windows, inspect file associations in Control Panel > Default Programs. On macOS, check Get Info for a .wrf file.Affected if WRF files are associated with the vulnerable player version detected in step 1 or 2
-
Inspect recent WRF file processing activityReview the system for any recently opened or processed .wrf files. Check browser download folders, email attachments, or shared network locations where WRF files may have been opened.Affected if The system has processed .wrf files with the vulnerable player installed, indicating potential exploitation vector
A system is affected if the WebEx WRF Player version matches any of the affected version ranges (27.11.x, 27.21.x, 27.25.x before 27.25.10, or 27.32.x before 27.32.1) and the player processes WRF files from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped27.25.1027.32.1
Apply vendor patches: Update T27 LC to SP25 EP10 or later, T27 LD to SP32 CP1 or later, and apply corresponding patches for L and LB branches. Implement network controls to block untrusted WRF files until patching is complete.
Latest WRF Player version (27.32.1+ for T27 LD, or the most recent available for your branch)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) Player by opening the player and checking About or checking Add/Remove Programs.
- 2. Determine which version branch you are on (T27 L, T27 LB, T27 LC, or T27 LD) based on your version number.
- 3. For T27 L branch (versions 27.11.0-27.11.26): Upgrade to version 27.11.27 or later.
- 4. For T27 LB branch (versions 27.21.0-27.21.10): Upgrade to version 27.21.11 or later.
- 5. For T27 LC branch (versions 27.25.0-27.25.9): Upgrade to SP25 EP10 or later version.
- 6. For T27 LD branch (versions 27.32.0): Upgrade to SP32 CP1 or later version (27.32.1 or higher).
- 7. Download the fixed version from Cisco's official download site or through your Cisco support contract at tools.cisco.com.
- 8. Uninstall the current WRF Player version through Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1335 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1335 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data