CVE-2012-1516
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe VMX process in VMware ESXi 3.5 through 4.1 and ESX 3.5 through 4.1 does not properly handle RPC commands, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (memory overwrite and process crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code on the host OS via vectors involving data pointers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe VMX (virtual machine monitor) process in VMware ESXi 3.5 through 4.1 and ESX 3.5 through 4.1 fails to properly validate RPC command handling, allowing a malicious user within a guest virtual machine to corrupt memory, crash the VMX process, or potentially achieve arbitrary code execution on the host operating system via crafted data pointers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.5= 4.0= 4.1= 3.5= 4.0= 4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the ESXi/ESX versionRun `vmware -v` on the host console, or check the version in vSphere Client under Configuration > Security Profile, or view /proc/vmware/version in the service consoleAffected if The version is 3.5, 4.0, or 4.1 (any build)
-
Confirm VMX process is runningRun `ps | grep vmx` or check via esxcli vm process list to see active virtual machinesAffected if Any VMX processes are active on an affected ESXi/ESX host
-
Check if VM communication channel is enabledExamine the .vmx configuration file for each VM and look for the setting `vmx.buildType = "release"` or check if the VM has VMware Tools installed, which enables the guest-to-host communication channelAffected if VMs with VMware Tools installed are running on an affected version (this enables the RPC pathway)
-
Identify VMs with potentially untrusted ownersReview VM inventory in vSphere Client to identify any VMs from untrusted sources, tenants, or that run unpatched/untrusted guest operating systemsAffected if Untrusted or potentially compromised VMs are running on an affected ESXi/ESX host
If the host runs ESXi/ESX version 3.5, 4.0, or 4.1 and has active VMs with VMware Tools, the environment is potentially affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply VMware security patches for CVE-2012-1516 to all affected ESXi/ESX hosts; until patched, avoid running untrusted or potentially compromised virtual machines on affected hosts.
Upgrade to ESXi 5.5 or later (preferably 7.x/8.x for active support); or apply VMware security patches ESXi350-201206001 / ESXi400-201206001 / ESXi410-201206001 or later for older versions
- 1. Identify current VMware ESX/ESXi version using 'vmware -v' or 'esxupdate -r query' command
- 2. Download the appropriate VMware security patch from vmware.com/support/patches/ or the specific patch for this CVE
- 3. For ESXi 4.1: Apply Patch ESXi410-201206001 or later via 'esxcli software vib update -d /path/to/patch.zip'
- 4. For ESXi 4.0: Apply Patch ESXi400-201206001 or later via 'esxcli software vib update -d /path/to/patch.zip'
- 5. For ESXi 3.5: Apply Patch ESXi350-201206001 or later via 'esxupdate' command
- 6. Alternatively, migrate to a supported vSphere version (5.5, 6.x, 7.x, or 8.x) for long-term security support
- 7. After patching, verify the version contains the fix and restart the host
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1516 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1516 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data