ArgyllcmsApplication

CVE-2012-1616

HIGH · 9.3 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-06-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.11 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Use-after-free vulnerability in icclib before 2.13, as used by Argyll CMS before 1.4 and possibly other programs, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) or execute arbitrary code via a crafted ICC profile file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Use-after-free vulnerability in icclib library versions before 2.13 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service via a specially crafted ICC profile file. The vulnerability affects Argyll CMS before 1.4 and potentially other software that links against the vulnerable icclib versions.

MitigationUpgrade icclib to version 2.13 or later and Argyll CMS to 1.4 or later. As a defense-in-depth measure, implement strict validation of ICC profile files before processing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ArgyllcmsApplication
Affected:<= 1.3.7= 0.1.0= 0.2.0= 0.2.1= 0.2.2= 0.3.0= 0.6.0= 0.7.0= 1.0.0= 1.0.2= 1.0.3= 1.0.4
IcclibApplication
Affected:<= 2.11= 1.23= 2.00= 2.02= 2.03

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Argyll CMS version
    Run 'argyllgamut -v' or check package manager for argyllcms version
    Affected if Version is 1.3.7 or lower, or matches any of these: 0.1.0, 0.2.0, 0.2.1, 0.2.2, 0.3.0, 0.6.0, 0.7.0, 1.0.0, 1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4, or any version below 1.4.0
  2. Identify installed icclib version
    Run 'icclib -v' if available, or check shared library version via 'ldconfig -p | grep icclib' and examine the library file metadata, or check software that bundles icclib
    Affected if Version is 2.11 or lower, or matches: 1.23, 2.00, 2.02, or 2.03, or any version below 2.13
  3. Determine if software processes ICC profile files
    Review application logs, configuration, or usage patterns to see if ICC profile loading is a normal operation. Check for commands like 'collink', 'spotread', 'targen', or other Argyll tools that handle color profiles
    Affected if The software routinely loads, parses, or validates ICC profile files as part of normal operation
  4. Verify ICC profile processing is enabled
    Examine application configuration files, command-line arguments, or environment variables that control ICC profile handling in your color management workflow
    Affected if ICC profile processing, parsing, or loading features are enabled or accessible to untrusted profile files

You are affected if you have Argyll CMS below version 1.4 or icclib below version 2.13 installed AND your system processes ICC profile files from untrusted or external sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.11
Interim mitigation

Upgrade icclib to version 2.13 or later and Argyll CMS to 1.4 or later. As a defense-in-depth measure, implement strict validation of ICC profile files before processing.

Recommended fix High confidence

Argyll CMS 1.4 (which includes icclib 2.13)

  1. Upgrade icclib to version 2.13 or later
  2. Upgrade Argyll CMS to version 1.4 or later
Caveat Minor version upgrade expected to maintain backward compatibility; test ICC profile workflows after upgrade

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Argyllcms Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,400
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1616 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1616 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data