CVE-2012-1723
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 update 32 and earlier, 5 update 35 and earlier, and 1.4.2_37 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Hotspot.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCritical vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment Hotspot component affecting Java SE 7u4 and earlier, 6u32 and earlier, 5u35 and earlier, and 1.4.2_37 and earlier. Allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by bypassing Java sandbox restrictions, impacting confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.10.8>= 1.11.0, < 1.11.3= 5.0= 6.0= 6.2= 5.0= 6.0= 6.2= 5.0= 6.0<= 1.4.2_37= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0<= 1.4.2_37= 1.5.0= 1.6.0= 1.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Java versionRun 'java -version' or 'java -fullversion' from command line to see the installed JRE/JDK versionAffected if Version shows 1.4.2_37 or earlier, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0, or any 7u4 and earlier (1.7.0_u4 or earlier)
-
Check Oracle JDK package versionOn Red Hat systems, run 'rpm -qa | grep -i jdk' to list installed JDK packagesAffected if Package version corresponds to affected Oracle JDK versions listed (1.4.2_37 or earlier, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0)
-
Check Oracle JRE package versionOn Red Hat systems, run 'rpm -qa | grep -i jre' to list installed JRE packagesAffected if Package version corresponds to affected Oracle JRE versions listed (1.4.2_37 or earlier, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0)
-
Check Icedtea6 package versionOn Red Hat systems using OpenJDK/Icedtea, run 'rpm -qa | grep icedtea' to identify versionAffected if Version is earlier than 1.10.8, or between 1.11.0 and 1.11.2 inclusive
-
Verify Hotspot JIT compiler presenceRun 'java -version -verbose' or check for 'hotspot' in Java runtime details to confirm Hotspot is in useAffected if Hotspot JVM is present and running an affected Java version
Your environment is affected if any installed Java version (JDK, JRE, or Icedtea6) falls within the affected version ranges: 1.4.2 through 1.4.2_37, 1.5.0, 1.6.0, 1.7.0 (7u4 and earlier), or Icedtea6 <1.10.8 or 1.11.0-1.11.2
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.10.81.11.3
Apply Oracle's Java security updates (Java 7 Update 7, Java 6 Update 35, or later). If immediate patching is not feasible, disable the Java browser plugin and restrict Java applets until updates can be deployed.
JDK/JRE 7u5+, 6u33+, 5u36+, or 1.4.2_38+ | IcedTea6 1.10.8+ or 1.11.3+
- Identify the currently installed Java/JRE version by running 'java -version' or checking the system package manager
- For Oracle Java SE: Upgrade to JDK/JRE 7 Update 5 or later (if using Java 7), or JDK/JRE 6 Update 33 or later (if using Java 6), or JDK/JRE 5 Update 36 or later (if using Java 5)
- For OpenJDK: Upgrade to a version beyond the affected releases listed (1.7.0_05+, 1.6.0_33+, 1.5.0_36+)
- For IcedTea6: Upgrade to version 1.10.8 or later, or 1.11.3 or later
- For Red Hat Enterprise Linux systems: Run 'yum update java-*' or 'rhn-update' to apply available security patches
- Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'java -version' and confirming the new version number
- Restart any running Java applications to ensure they use the updated JRE
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1723 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1723 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data