CVE-2012-1805
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in the ECOM Ethernet module in Koyo H0-ECOM, H0-ECOM100, H2-ECOM, H2-ECOM-F, H2-ECOM100, H4-ECOM, H4-ECOM-F, and H4-ECOM100 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long strings in unspecified parameters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the ECOM Ethernet module for multiple Koyo PLC Ethernet interface modules allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via long strings in unspecified parameters, achieving maximum severity (CVSS 10) due to the trivial exploitability and complete impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Koyo PLC hardware with ECOM modulesInventory the industrial control system for Koyo PLCs (H0, H2, H4 series) that utilize ECOM Ethernet interface modules. Review network diagrams, asset inventories, or physically inspect PLC hardware for ECOM module presence.Affected if Any Koyo PLC with an ECOM Ethernet module (H0 Ecom, H0 Ecom100, H2 Ecom, H2 Ecom F, H2 Ecom100, H4 Ecom, H4 Ecom F, H4 Ecom100) is present in the environment.
-
Confirm ECOM Ethernet module is installed and activeCheck the PLC configuration or runtime status to verify the ECOM Ethernet module is physically installed and actively running. On the PLC, examine module status indicators or query the module via the programming software (such as Koyo DirectSOFT) for active Ethernet module detection.Affected if The ECOM Ethernet module shows as installed or active in the PLC configuration.
-
Assess network accessibility of the ECOM moduleDetermine if the ECOM Ethernet interface is reachable on the network by attempting to ping the module IP address, scanning for open ports (common ECOM ports include TCP 28784, 28785 for Koyo protocols), or reviewing firewall rules and network segmentation around the PLC.Affected if The ECOM Ethernet module has an IP address assigned and is accessible from any network segment beyond isolated engineering workstations.
-
Review for suspicious or anomalous network trafficMonitor network logs or intrusion detection systems for unusual or excessively long parameter strings being sent to the ECOM module, or for signs of exploitation attempts targeting the Ethernet interface.Affected if Network traffic to the ECOM module contains abnormally long strings or patterns consistent with buffer overflow probing.
If a Koyo ECOM Ethernet module (any model, any firmware version) is present and its Ethernet interface is network-accessible, the environment is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate affected ECOM modules on a restricted network segment and apply vendor firmware updates if available; if no patch exists, implement compensating controls such as firewall rules limiting access to authorized engineering stations and monitoring for exploitation attempts.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-1805 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-1805 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data