Ubercart PayflowApplication · Paypal

CVE-2012-2058

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-09-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The Ubercart Payflow module for Drupal does not use a secure token, which allows remote attackers to forge payments via unspecified vectors.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The Ubercart Payflow module for Drupal fails to implement secure token validation in its payment processing flow. This allows remote attackers to craft malicious payment requests without proper token verification, enabling payment forgery. The vulnerability stems from the module not validating that payment requests originate from legitimate, authorized sources.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of the Ubercart Payflow module that implements proper token validation, or disable the Payflow payment method until a fix can be applied. Review all recent payment transactions for signs of fraudulent activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ubercart PayflowApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Ubercart Payflow module installation
    Check your Drupal modules directory for the presence of the uc_payflow module. In a typical Drupal installation, navigate to sites/all/modules/ubercart/payment/uc_payflow or similar path and verify the module files exist.
    Affected if The uc_payflow module directory exists in the Drupal modules folder
  2. Verify Payflow payment method is enabled
    Log into the Drupal administration panel, navigate to Store > Configuration > Payment methods, and check if the Payflow payment method is listed as enabled.
    Affected if Payflow is listed as an active payment method in Ubercart settings
  3. Inspect module for token validation code
    Examine the main module file (typically uc_payflow.module) and look for functions that handle payment request validation. Search for terms like 'token', 'validate', 'verify', or 'check' in the payment processing functions.
    Affected if The module code lacks token validation functions or contains payment processing without token verification checks
  4. Check payment processing callback endpoint
    Review the payment callback handler in the module (often in uc_payflow.module or uc_payflow.pages.inc) to see if incoming payment notifications validate the origin or integrity of the request.
    Affected if Payment callback handlers accept requests without verifying token or origin legitimacy
  5. Review payment transaction logs
    Access Ubercart admin logs under Store > Orders > View logs or similar, and examine recent payment transactions for suspicious patterns such as unexpected amounts, unusual timing, or requests lacking proper transaction identifiers.
    Affected if Recent payment transactions show signs of forged or unauthorized requests in the logs

If the Ubercart Payflow module is installed with the Payflow payment method enabled, the environment is affected since all versions lack proper token validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of the Ubercart Payflow module that implements proper token validation, or disable the Payflow payment method until a fix can be applied. Review all recent payment transactions for signs of fraudulent activity.

Fix this in Ubercart Payflow Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2058 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2058 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data