Web GatewayApplication · Mcafee

CVE-2012-2212

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-04-28
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
McAfee Web Gateway 7.0 allows remote attackers to bypass the access configuration for the CONNECT method by providing an arbitrary allowed hostname in the Host HTTP header. NOTE: this issue might not be reproducible, because the researcher did not provide configuration details for the vulnerable system, and the observed behavior might be consistent with a configuration that was (perhaps inadvertently) designed to allow access based on Host HTTP headers

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

McAfee Web Gateway 7.0 contains a vulnerability where the CONNECT method access controls can be bypassed by providing an arbitrary allowed hostname in the Host HTTP header. This allows attackers to potentially route traffic through the proxy to unauthorized destinations by manipulating the Host header to match an allowed domain. The vulnerability's reproducibility is uncertain as it may depend on specific gateway configurations.

MitigationReview and strengthen CONNECT method access control policies in McAfee Web Gateway to validate actual destination addresses rather than relying solely on the Host HTTP header, and ensure configuration aligns with intended security policy.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Web GatewayApplication
Affected:= 7.0.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm McAfee Web Gateway installation and version
    Locate the McAfee Web Gateway installation and check the installed version number. Common locations include /opt/mwg or checking the product via the management interface or system inventory.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.0.0 (only this specific version is affected)
  2. Verify CONNECT method proxy functionality is enabled
    Check the Web Gateway proxy configuration to determine if the CONNECT method is enabled for HTTPS proxying. This is typically found in proxy listener settings or forwarding rules.
    Affected if CONNECT method handling is enabled and the proxy accepts CONNECT requests
  3. Review CONNECT method access control policy
    Examine the access control rules or policies applied to the CONNECT method. Look for rules that control which destinations the proxy can connect to on behalf of clients.
    Affected if Access controls exist but rely primarily on the Host HTTP header for destination validation rather than validating the actual target IP/hostname
  4. Check for Host header-based destination allowlist
    Inspect the proxy configuration for any allowlists or rules that permit specific hostnames or domains for CONNECT requests. Determine if these rules match against the Host header without additional verification.
    Affected if An allowlist of allowed hostnames exists and is enforced based on the Host header value alone

A user is affected if they run McAfee Web Gateway version 7.0.0 with CONNECT method access controls that validate destinations using only the Host HTTP header rather than the actual connection target.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Review and strengthen CONNECT method access control policies in McAfee Web Gateway to validate actual destination addresses rather than relying solely on the Host HTTP header, and ensure configuration aligns with intended security policy.

Fix this in Web Gateway Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2212 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data