LibavApplication

CVE-2012-2775

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-09-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 0.10.4 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in the read_var_block_data function in libavcodec/alsdec.c in FFmpeg before 0.11, and Libav 0.7.x before 0.7.7 and 0.8.x before 0.8.4, has unknown impact and attack vectors, related to a large order and an "out of array write in quant_cof."

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Buffer overflow vulnerability in the ALS (Audio Lossless Coding) decoder in FFmpeg and Libav. The read_var_block_data function in libavcodec/alsdec.c does not properly validate the 'order' parameter, allowing a large order value to cause an out-of-bounds write beyond the allocated quant_cof array. This could enable arbitrary code execution via specially crafted ALS audio files.

MitigationUpdate FFmpeg to version 0.11 or later, or Libav to version 0.7.7/0.8.4 or later. If updates are unavailable, disable ALS codec support in the affected libraries.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
LibavApplication
Affected:= 0.8= 0.8.1= 0.8.2= 0.8.3= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.7.2= 0.7.3= 0.7.4= 0.7.5= 0.7.6
FfmpegApplication
Affected:<= 0.10.4= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the media library in use
    Run 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version' (Libav uses avconv) to determine which library is installed
    Affected if The output shows FFmpeg or Libav is present
  2. Check the installed version
    For FFmpeg: run 'ffmpeg -version' and note the version number. For Libav: run 'avconv -version' and note the version number
    Affected if Version is FFmpeg <= 0.10.4, or FFmpeg 0.3.x/0.4.x series, or Libav 0.7.x/0.8.x series (specific versions listed in CVE
  3. Verify ALS decoder is available
    Run 'ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i als' or 'avconv -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i als' to check if the ALS decoder is compiled in
    Affected if The ALS decoder is listed as available (decoders include D ALS)

You are affected if you are using FFmpeg <= 0.10.4 or FFmpeg 0.3.x/0.4.x, or Libav 0.7.x/0.8.x, AND the ALS decoder is enabled in your build

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 0.10.4
Interim mitigation

Update FFmpeg to version 0.11 or later, or Libav to version 0.7.7/0.8.4 or later. If updates are unavailable, disable ALS codec support in the affected libraries.

Recommended fix High confidence

FFmpeg 0.11+ or Libav 0.7.7+/0.8.4+

  1. 1. Identify which library (FFmpeg or Libav) is in use in your system by running 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version'
  2. 2. For FFmpeg users: Upgrade to FFmpeg 0.11 or later (recommended: latest stable release)
  3. 3. For Libav users: If using 0.7.x line, upgrade to 0.7.7 or later; if using 0.8.x line, upgrade to 0.8.4 or later
  4. 4. Obtain the fixed version from your distribution's package manager or compile from source at ffmpeg.org or libav.org
  5. 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version: 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version'
  6. 6. Test that your media processing workflows function correctly with the new version
Caveat Major version upgrades in FFmpeg/Libav may introduce API/ABI changes that require recompilation of dependent software; test thoroughly before production deployment

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Libav Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
6.0 hours of engineering $1,040
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2775 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2775 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data