CVE-2012-2779
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the decode_frame function in libavcodec/indeo5.c in FFmpeg before 0.11, and Libav 0.7.x before 0.7.7 and 0.8.x before 0.8.4, has unknown impact and attack vectors, related to an invalid "gop header" and decoding in a "half initialized context."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow/memory corruption vulnerability in the Indeo 5 video decoder (libavcodec/indeo5.c) where an invalid GOP header causes the decode_frame function to proceed in a half-initialized context. Given CVSS 10, this is likely exploitable for remote code execution via malicious video content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.7.2= 0.7.3= 0.7.4= 0.7.5= 0.7.6= 0.8= 0.8.1= 0.8.2= 0.8.3<= 0.10.4= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libavcodec or ffmpeg versionRun 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version' to determine the exact version number of the libraryAffected if Version matches 0.7.x (0.7 to 0.7.6), 0.8.x (0.8 to 0.8.3), 0.3.x, 0.4.x, or is less than or equal to 0.10.4 for FFmpeg
-
Confirm libavcodec library presenceCheck for libavcodec shared library file (commonly libavcodec.so or libavcodec.dylib in system libraries) using 'ldconfig -p' on Linux or 'ls /usr/lib/libavcodec*' on Unix-like systemsAffected if The library is present and its version matches the affected ranges
-
Check if Indeo 5 decoder module existsLook for the indeo5.c compiled object or the decoder module within libavcodec; on Linux 'strings libavcodec.so | grep indeo5' may reveal the decoder is compiled inAffected if The Indeo 5 decoder (indeo5) is compiled into or available within the installed libavcodec library
-
Detect Indeo 5 video content processing capabilityRun 'ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i indeo' or 'avconv -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i indeo' to list supported Indeo codecsAffected if Indeo 5 (indeo5) or Indeo Video (indeo) decoder is listed as supported, indicating the vulnerable code path could be triggered
You are affected if your installed FFmpeg or Libav version falls within the listed affected ranges and the Indeo 5 decoder is available or could process video content from untrusted sources.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to FFmpeg 0.11 or later, or Libav 0.7.7+/0.8.4+. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, restrict or disable processing of Indeo 5 video content from untrusted sources.
FFmpeg >= 0.11, or Libav >= 0.7.7 (for 0.7.x) / >= 0.8.4 (for 0.8.x)
- Identify whether the system uses FFmpeg or Libav by checking the installed binary (run 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version')
- For FFmpeg: Check current version with 'ffmpeg -version'
- For Libav: Check current version with 'avconv -version'
- If using FFmpeg <= 0.10.4 or 0.3.x, upgrade to FFmpeg >= 0.11
- If using Libav 0.7.x <= 0.7.6, upgrade to Libav >= 0.7.7
- If using Libav 0.8.x <= 0.8.3, upgrade to Libav >= 0.8.4
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2779 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2779 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data