CVE-2012-2784
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the decode_pic function in libavcodec/cavsdec.c in FFmpeg before 0.11, and Libav 0.7.x before 0.7.7 and 0.8.x before 0.8.4, has unknown impact and attack vectors, related to "width/height changing in CAVS," a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-2777.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceA vulnerability exists in the decode_pic function within libavcodec/cavsdec.c in FFmpeg and Libav video codecs. The flaw relates to improper handling of width/height changes in the CAVS (Chinese AVS video) decoder, which could potentially allow remote code execution or denial of service. The specific exploitation mechanism is unspecified in the advisory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.8= 0.8.1= 0.8.2= 0.8.3= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.7.2= 0.7.3= 0.7.4= 0.7.5= 0.7.6<= 0.10.4= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed video codec libraryRun 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version' to determine if FFmpeg or Libav is installed and which oneAffected if The output shows FFmpeg version <= 0.10.4, 0.3.x, 0.4.x, or Libav version 0.7.x or 0.8.x (specifically 0.7-0.7.6 or 0.8-0.8.3)
-
Check libavcodec version directlyRun 'ffmpeg -version 2>&1 | grep libavcodec' or 'avconv -version 2>&1 | grep libavcodec' to get the exact libavcodec version numberAffected if The libavcodec version shown is any of: Libav 0.7 through 0.7.6, Libav 0.8 through 0.8.3, FFmpeg 0.3.x, FFmpeg 0.4.x through 0.4.6, or FFmpeg 0.10.4 or earlier
-
Verify CAVS decoder availabilityRun 'ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i cavs' or 'avconv -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i cavs' to list whether the CAVS (Chinese AVS) decoder is compiled inAffected if The CAVS decoder appears in the codec list (it may show as 'CAVS' or 'avs' in the decoder list)
-
Inspect linked library filesRun 'ldd $(which ffmpeg 2>/dev/null)' or 'ldd $(which avconv 2>/dev/null)' to list linked libavcodec library and check its file path, then use 'ls -la' on that library file for version cluesAffected if The linked libavcodec.so version corresponds to any affected version listed
A system is affected if it runs FFmpeg <= 0.10.4, 0.3.x, or 0.4.x, OR Libav 0.7.x/0.8.x, AND has the CAVS decoder enabled, and processes CAVS video content
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate FFmpeg to version 0.11 or later, or Libav to version 0.7.7/0.8.4 or later. Conduct a dependency audit to identify and rebuild any software incorporating the affected library versions.
FFmpeg 0.11+ or Libav 0.7.7+/0.8.4+
- 1. Identify which library (Libav or FFmpeg) is in use in your environment
- 2. Determine the currently installed version using: ffmpeg -version or avconv -version
- 3. For FFmpeg users: Upgrade to version 0.11 or later (e.g., 0.11, 0.11.1, or later stable releases)
- 4. For Libav users on 0.7.x branch: Upgrade to version 0.7.7 or later
- 5. For Libav users on 0.8.x branch: Upgrade to version 0.8.4 or later
- 6. Verify the vulnerability is resolved by checking the decode_pic function in libavcodec/cavsdec.c no longer contains the unspecified flaw
- 7. Test that video decoding functionality remains operational after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2784 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2784 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data