CVE-2012-2791
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the (1) decode_band_hdr function in indeo4.c and (2) ff_ivi_decode_blocks function in ivi_common.c in libavcodec/ in FFmpeg before 0.11, and Libav 0.7.x before 0.7.7 and 0.8.x before 0.8.5, have unknown impact and attack vectors, related to the "transform size."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple vulnerabilities exist in FFmpeg and Libav's libavcodec library affecting video codec decoding. The decode_band_hdr function in indeo4.c (Indeo 4 codec) and ff_ivi_decode_blocks in ivi_common.c (IVI codec) contain unspecified issues related to transform size handling, likely allowing memory corruption during video frame decoding.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 0.10.4= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6= 0.8= 0.8.1= 0.8.2= 0.8.3= 0.8.4= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.7.2= 0.7.3= 0.7.4= 0.7.5= 0.7.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libraryRun 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version' to determine if FFmpeg or Libav is installed. FFmpeg typically shows 'ffmpeg version', Libav shows 'avconv version'.Affected if The output shows either FFmpeg or Libav is present on the system.
-
Get exact version numberParse the version string from the output of 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version'. Note the full version number (e.g., 0.10.4, 0.8.3, 0.7.5).Affected if A version number is displayed from the command output.
-
Compare version to affected rangesCompare your installed version against: FFmpeg <= 0.10.4, 0.3.x, 0.4.0-0.4.6; Libav 0.7.x, 0.8.x. Note that version 0.3.x means 0.3 through 0.3.4 inclusive, and 0.4.x means 0.4.0 through 0.4.6.Affected if Your version falls within any of these ranges: FFmpeg 0.3.x, 0.4.0-0.4.6, <= 0.10.4; or Libav 0.7.x, 0.8.x.
-
Check if vulnerable codecs are availableRun 'ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i indeo' or 'avconv -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i indeo' to list Indeo codec support. Similarly check for IVI with 'ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i ivi'.Affected if The output shows indeo4 or ivi codec support (flags may include 'D' for decoding).
You are affected if your system has FFmpeg <= 0.10.4, any 0.3.x, or any 0.4.x version; or Libav 0.7.x or 0.8.x, AND the indeo4 or ivi video codecs are available for decoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FFmpeg to version 0.11 or later, or Libav to version 0.7.7+/0.8.5+. Applications using these library versions for video decoding are vulnerable until the library is patched.
FFmpeg >= 0.11, or Libav >= 0.7.7 / 0.8.5
- 1. Identify the currently installed FFmpeg or Libav version using 'ffmpeg -version' or 'libavcodec version'
- 2. For FFmpeg users: Upgrade to version 0.11 or later (e.g., 0.11, 0.11.1, etc.)
- 3. For Libav users: If using 0.7.x branch, upgrade to 0.7.7 or later; if using 0.8.x branch, upgrade to 0.8.5 or later
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the new version number
- 5. Test that media encoding/decoding functionality still works as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2791 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2791 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data