CVE-2012-2793
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the lag_decode_zero_run_line function in libavcodec/lagarith.c in FFmpeg before 0.11, and Libav 0.7.x before 0.7.7 and 0.8.x before 0.8.4, has unknown impact and attack vectors related to "too many zeros."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHeap-based memory corruption vulnerability in the Lagarith lossless video codec decoder (libavcodec/lagarith.c). The lag_decode_zero_run_line function fails to properly validate or limit zero-run lengths when processing crafted video files, allowing controlled memory writes beyond buffer boundaries. This can be triggered by processing a malicious Lagarith-compressed video file, potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.7= 0.7.1= 0.7.2= 0.7.3= 0.7.4= 0.7.5= 0.7.6= 0.8= 0.8.1= 0.8.2= 0.8.3<= 0.10.4= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if FFmpeg or Libav is installedRun `ffmpeg -version 2>&1` or `avconv -version 2>&1` to identify the installed application and its version numberAffected if The installed version falls within the affected ranges: Libav 0.7-0.8.3 or FFmpeg <=0.10.4, or versions 0.3.x through 0.4.6
-
Verify the lagarith decoder is availableRun `ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i lagarith` or `avconv -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i lagarith`. This shows whether the lagarith decoder module is compiled and availableAffected if The lagarith decoder is listed as available (indicates the vulnerable code path exists in the environment)
-
Identify the exact libavcodec versionRun `ffmpeg -version 2>&1 | grep libav` or check the shared library file with `ls -la /usr/lib/*/libavcodec.so*` or `dpkg -l | grep libavcodec` to determine the precise library versionAffected if The libavcodec version matches the affected versions listed in the CVE (Libav 0.7-0.8.3, FFmpeg <=0.10.4 or 0.3-0.4.6)
-
Confirm active use of Lagarith codecInspect any video files or media processing pipelines for `.lagarith` or similar Lagarith-compressed content, or check configuration files for lagarith as an allowed decoderAffected if The environment processes or is configured to process Lagarith-compressed video files
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable FFmpeg or Libav version (0.7-0.8.3 for Libav, or <=0.10.4 / 0.3-0.4.6 for FFmpeg) AND has the lagarith decoder available AND processes Lagarith-compressed video files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to FFmpeg 0.11 or later, or Libav 0.7.7+/0.8.4+. Until patched, avoid processing untrusted video files using the Lagarith codec with vulnerable versions.
FFmpeg: 0.11 or later; Libav: 0.7.7+/0.8.4+ or latest stable
- Identify whether the affected system uses Libav or FFmpeg
- For FFmpeg: upgrade to version 0.11 or later (e.g., latest stable release)
- For Libav 0.7.x: upgrade to version 0.7.7 or later
- For Libav 0.8.x: upgrade to version 0.8.4 or later
- After upgrade, verify the lag_decode_zero_run function in libavcodec/lagarith.c is no longer vulnerable
- Test that the upgraded library handles files with many zeros correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2793 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2793 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data