CVE-2012-2804
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in libavcodec/indeo3.c in FFmpeg before 0.11 and Libav 0.8.x before 0.8.5 has unknown impact and attack vectors, related to "reallocation code" and the luma height and width.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in libavcodec/indeo3.c's reallocation code when handling luma height and width parameters in the Indeo 3 video codec decoder. The unspecified flaw allows potential memory corruption during buffer reallocation operations in older versions of FFmpeg (<0.11) and Libav (<0.8.5).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 0.8= 0.8.1= 0.8.2= 0.8.3= 0.8.4<= 0.10.4= 0.3= 0.3.1= 0.3.2= 0.3.3= 0.3.4= 0.4.0= 0.4.2= 0.4.3= 0.4.4= 0.4.5= 0.4.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed video codec libraryRun `ffmpeg -version` or `avconv -version` to determine if FFmpeg or Libav is installed and note the version number. If using libavcodec as a shared library, check the package manager or examine the library file (e.g., `dpkg -l | grep -E 'ffmpeg|libav'` on Debian-based systems, or `rpm -qa | grep -E 'ffmpeg|libav'` on RHEL-based systems).Affected if The version output shows FFmpeg or Libav from the affected version ranges (Libav 0.8-0.8.4, or FFmpeg 0.3-0.10.4 or 0.4.0-0.4.6).
-
Verify the indeo3 decoder is presentRun `ffmpeg -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i indeo3` or `avconv -codecs 2>/dev/null | grep -i indeo3` to list decoders and check if indeo3 (or ivi3) is listed as available. Alternatively, check the libavcodec configuration file or probe the library with `ldd` on the application using it.Affected if The indeo3 decoder appears in the list of supported codecs, indicating the vulnerable code path could be triggered.
-
Confirm library version against affected rangesCompare the discovered version number to the affected ranges: Libav 0.8, 0.8.1, 0.8.2, 0.8.3, 0.8.4; FFmpeg <= 0.10.4, or versions 0.3.x, 0.4.0, 0.4.2-0.4.6. If the exact version is unclear, treat ambiguous or unpatched installations as potentially affected.Affected if The installed version matches any version in the listed affected ranges.
A user is affected if they have FFmpeg or Libav installed with a version matching the affected ranges AND the indeo3 decoder is available in their build.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to FFmpeg 0.11 or later, or Libav 0.8.5 or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling or restricting the indeo3 codec decoder in affected applications.
FFmpeg 0.11 or later; Libav 0.8.5 or later
- 1. Identify which library (Libav or FFmpeg) is in use in your system by checking the installed version: 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version'
- 2. If using Libav 0.8.x, upgrade to Libav 0.8.5 or later (preferably latest 0.8.x stable release)
- 3. If using FFmpeg 0.10.x or earlier, upgrade to FFmpeg 0.11 or later (preferably latest stable release)
- 4. If using FFmpeg 0.3.x, upgrade to FFmpeg 0.11 or later as these versions are also affected
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by running 'ffmpeg -version' or 'avconv -version' and confirming the version number meets the fixed release criteria
- 6. Rebuild any dependent applications that link against the library to ensure they use the updated version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2804 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2804 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data