CVE-2012-2828
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple integer overflows in the PDF functionality in Google Chrome before 20.0.1132.43 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted document.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceInteger overflow vulnerabilities in Google Chrome's PDF parsing functionality before version 20.0.1132.43 allow remote attackers to trigger heap corruption via crafted PDF documents, potentially causing denial of service (browser crash) or potentially enabling arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 20.0.1132.42= 20.0.1132.0= 20.0.1132.1= 20.0.1132.2= 20.0.1132.3= 20.0.1132.4= 20.0.1132.5= 20.0.1132.6= 20.0.1132.7= 20.0.1132.8= 20.0.1132.9= 20.0.1132.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Chrome version numberOpen Chrome, click the menu icon (three dots), select Help, then About Google Chrome. The version number is displayed on that page. Alternatively, navigate to chrome://version/ in the address bar.Affected if The installed version is 20.0.1132.42 or earlier, or matches any of the specific affected versions (20.0.1132.0 through 20.0.1132.10).
-
Verify PDF plugin or PDF viewer is enabledNavigate to chrome://settings/handlers in the address bar, or go to Settings > Privacy and security > Site Settings > Additional content settings > PDF documents. Check if the built-in PDF viewer is enabled.Affected if The PDF viewer is enabled (this is the component with the vulnerability).
A user is affected if they are running Google Chrome version 20.0.1132.42 or earlier (including versions 20.0.1132.0 through 20.0.1132.10) and have the built-in PDF viewer enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Google Chrome to version 20.0.1132.43 or later. Ensure auto-updates are enabled or deploy the update through enterprise patch management.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2828 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2828 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data