CVE-2012-2880
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRace condition in Google Chrome before 22.0.1229.79 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have unspecified other impact via vectors related to the plug-in paint buffer.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA race condition vulnerability in Google Chrome versions prior to 22.0.1229.79 allows remote attackers to cause denial of service or potentially achieve unspecified impact via vectors involving the plug-in paint buffer. The race condition occurs when the browser handles painting operations in plugins, potentially allowing an attacker to trigger unsafe memory operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 22.0.1229.78= 22.0.1229.0= 22.0.1229.1= 22.0.1229.2= 22.0.1229.3= 22.0.1229.4= 22.0.1229.6= 22.0.1229.7= 22.0.1229.8= 22.0.1229.9= 22.0.1229.10= 22.0.1229.11= 12.1= 12.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Google Chrome versionOpen Chrome, click the menu icon (three dots), select Help > About Google Chrome. The version number will display on this page.Affected if The installed version is 22.0.1229.78 or earlier, or matches any of the affected versions 22.0.1229.0 through 22.0.1229.11.
-
Check Chrome version via command lineOn Windows, run 'chrome --version' or 'reg query "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Google Chrome" /v Version' in Command Prompt. On Mac, run '/Applications/Google\ Chrome.app/Contents/MacOS/Google\ Chrome --version'. On Linux, run 'google-chrome --version' or 'chromium --version'.Affected if The reported version is 22.0.1229.78 or earlier, or matches any affected version in the 22.0.1229.0-22.0.1229.11 range.
-
Verify plugin usage in the browserNavigate to chrome://plugins in the Chrome address bar. Review which plugins are installed and enabled.Affected if Any plugins are enabled and the Chrome version is in the affected range, as the race condition occurs during plugin paint operations.
-
Check OpenSUSE system version (if Chrome on Linux)Run 'cat /etc/os-release' or 'lsb_release -a' in a terminal to identify the OpenSUSE version.Affected if The system is running OpenSUSE 12.1 or 12.2 with an affected Chrome version installed.
The environment is affected if Google Chrome version 22.0.1229.78 or earlier (or any version from 22.0.1229.0 to 22.0.1229.11) is installed, and plugins are enabled in the browser.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Google Chrome to version 22.0.1229.79 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Organizations should deploy the update through their patch management systems and verify successful installation across affected endpoints.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-2880 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-2880 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data