Vpn ClientApplication · Cisco

CVE-2012-3052

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-09-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
74/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Cisco VPN Client 5.0 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in the current working directory, aka Bug ID CSCua28747.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Cisco VPN Client 5.0 contains an untrusted search path vulnerability where the application loads DLLs from the current working directory without validation. A local attacker can place a malicious DLL with the same expected filename in a directory from which a victim launches the VPN client, causing arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running the client.

MitigationUsers should launch the Cisco VPN Client only from trusted, non-writable directories and avoid running it from locations like Downloads or shared network folders where untrusted users can place files. Organizations should ensure the application is launched from a clean, controlled directory path.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Vpn ClientApplication
Affected:= 5.0= 5.0.01= 5.0.01.0600= 5.0.2= 5.0.02.0090= 5.0.2.0090= 5.0.03.0530= 5.0.03.0560= 5.0.04.0300= 5.0.5= 5.0.05.0290= 5.0.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Cisco VPN Client version
    Open Windows Control Panel, navigate to Programs and Features, or right-click the Cisco VPN Client executable and select Properties to view the version information
    Affected if The displayed version matches any of these: 5.0, 5.0.01, 5.0.01.0600, 5.0.2, 5.0.02.0090, 5.0.2.0090, 5.0.03.0530, 5.0.03.0560, 5.0.04.0300, 5.0.5, 5.0.05.0290, or 5.0.6
  2. Determine typical launch directory for VPN Client
    Note the directory from which you or your users normally launch the Cisco VPN Client executable
    Affected if The application is launched from a directory that is writable by other users, such as Downloads, Desktop, or shared network folders
  3. Inspect launch directory for unexpected DLL files
    List all DLL files present in the directory from which the VPN Client is launched using 'dir *.dll' command in that directory
    Affected if Any unknown or unexpected DLL files exist in the launch directory that were not installed as part of the VPN Client installation
  4. Check PATH environment variable for vulnerable directory placement
    Review the system PATH and user PATH to see if directories where untrusted users can write appear before or in the same list as VPN Client directories
    Affected if Writable directories like Downloads, temp folders, or shared network paths are accessible to other local or network users and are used as working directories when launching the VPN Client

You are affected if the installed Cisco VPN Client version matches any of the listed affected versions AND the application can be launched from a directory where untrusted users can place files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Users should launch the Cisco VPN Client only from trusted, non-writable directories and avoid running it from locations like Downloads or shared network folders where untrusted users can place files. Organizations should ensure the application is launched from a clean, controlled directory path.

Fix this in Vpn Client Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,624.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3052 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3052 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data