CVE-2012-3054
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHeap-based buffer overflow in the Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player T27 L through SP11 EP26, T27 LB through SP21 EP10, T27 LC before SP25 EP11, T27 LD before SP32 CP2, and T28 L10N before SP1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted WRF file, aka Bug ID CSCtz72977.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Recording Format (WRF) player allows remote code execution via specially crafted WRF files. The flaw affects multiple T27 and T28 player versions. Exploitation requires user interaction to open a malicious WRF file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 27.11.0, <= 27.11.26>= 27.21.0, <= 27.21.10>= 27.25.0, < 27.25.11>= 27.32.0, < 27.32.2>= 28.0.0, < 28.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WebEx WRF player installationLocate the Cisco WebEx Recording Format Player installation on the system. Check common installation directories or use system tools to find the player software and its version information.Affected if The player is installed and the version falls within any of the following ranges: 27.11.0-27.11.26, 27.21.0-27.21.10, 27.25.0-27.25.10, 27.32.0-27.32.1, or 28.0.0-28.0.0
-
Retrieve installed player versionAccess the player version through the application interface, system registry, or version information embedded in the player executable. Compare the numeric version against the affected ranges provided.Affected if The installed version number is greater than or equal to 27.11.0 and less than or equal to 27.11.26, OR greater than or equal to 27.21.0 and less than or equal to 27.21.10, OR greater than or equal to 27.25.0 and less than 27.25.11, OR greater than or equal to 27.32.0 and less than 27.32.2, OR great
-
Assess WRF file handling exposureDetermine if the system is configured to handle .WRF files through the WebEx player. Check file association settings or user workflows that involve opening WebEx recording files.Affected if The WRF file type is associated with the vulnerable player version and users can be persuaded to open untrusted WRF files
The environment is affected if the installed Cisco WebEx Recording Format Player version falls within any of the specified vulnerable ranges and the system handles WRF files through that player.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped27.25.1127.32.228.0.1
Apply vendor-supplied patches/updates to upgrade affected WebEx player versions to the fixed releases (SP25 EP11 or later for T27 LC, SP32 CP2 or later for T27 LD, SP1 or later for T28 L10N). Consider disabling WRF file handling or implementing file-type validation at the gateway until patches are deployed.
Cisco WebEx Recording Format Player 27.32.2 or later stable release
- 1. Identify the currently installed Webex Recording Format (WRF) Player version from the system
- 2. Navigate to the Cisco WebEx download page or contact Cisco support for the latest WRF Player version
- 3. Download the latest Cisco WebEx Recording Format Player from official Cisco sources
- 4. Close any running WebEx applications
- 5. Uninstall the current WRF Player version from the system
- 6. Install the updated WRF Player version (27.32.2 or later, or the latest available stable release)
- 7. Verify the installation by checking the updated version number
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3054 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3054 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data