CVE-2012-3241
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe VMware Broker in Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2 does not properly authenticate SOAP requests, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary VMware Broker API commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe VMware Broker in Eucalyptus 2.0.3 and 3.0.x before 3.0.2 lacks proper authentication validation for incoming SOAP requests, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to send arbitrary VMware Broker API commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.3= 3.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed Eucalyptus versionRun 'eucalyptus-version' or check /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus-version file to determine the exact version installedAffected if Version is 2.0.3 or 3.0.1 specifically (only these versions are affected)
-
Identify if VMware Broker component is enabledCheck for running VMware Broker service: 'ps aux | grep -i vmware' or check service configuration in /etc/init.d/ for vmware-broker or eucalyptus-vmware-brokerAffected if VMware Broker service is running and exposed to network
-
Verify SOAP service accessibilityCheck if port 8773 (default Eucalyptus SOAP port) is listening: 'netstat -anp | grep 8773' or test connectivity to the SOAP endpointAffected if SOAP interface is externally accessible without authentication
-
Confirm VMware Broker API is reachableAttempt to access the VMware Broker WSDL or API endpoint, typically at http://localhost:8773/VMwareBroker or check if the endpoint responds to unauthenticated requestsAffected if The VMware Broker SOAP endpoint responds without requiring authentication credentials
The environment is affected if Eucalyptus version 2.0.3 or 3.0.1 is running with the VMware Broker component enabled and its SOAP interface exposed to network traffic without authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Eucalyptus to version 3.0.2 or later, which contains the fix for proper SOAP request authentication.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3241 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3241 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data