SitescopeApplication · Hp

CVE-2012-3263

HIGH · 10.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-09-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Unspecified vulnerability in a SOAP feature in HP SiteScope 11.10 through 11.12 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unknown vectors, aka ZDI-CAN-1465.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HP SiteScope versions 11.10 through 11.12 contain an unspecified vulnerability in a SOAP feature that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. This is a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exploitable without authentication, assigned ZDI-CAN-1465.

MitigationUpgrade HP SiteScope to a patched version beyond 11.12, or apply vendor-supplied patches. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to SiteScope SOAP interfaces and disable unnecessary services.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SitescopeApplication
Affected:= 11.10= 11.11= 11.12

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if HP SiteScope is installed
    Check for SiteScope installation directories (common paths: C:\HP\SiteScope or /opt/HP/SiteScope), running services named 'SiteScope', or processes named 'sitelink' or 'SiteScope'. Look in Windows Services or use 'sc query' on Windows, 'ps' or 'service' commands on Linux.
    Affected if HP SiteScope software is found on the system
  2. Determine the installed SiteScope version
    Locate the version file in the SiteScope installation directory. Common paths: <SiteScope_install>/version.xml, <SiteScope_install>/siteScope.properties, or <SiteScope_install>/readme.txt. Alternatively, access the SiteScope admin web interface and check the 'About' or 'Version' page.
    Affected if The version is exactly 11.10, 11.11, or 11.12
  3. Check if SOAP interface is enabled and accessible
    Identify the SOAP port (default: 8080 or 8443). Look in <SiteScope_install>/conf/server.xml or <SiteScope_install>/logs for SOAP-related configurations. Verify the SOAP endpoint responds by sending an HTTP request to the SOAP port (example: curl -X GET http://<host>:<port>/SiteScope/services).
    Affected if The SOAP service is running and responds to network requests
  4. Verify network exposure of the SOAP interface
    Review firewall rules, network ACLs, or load balancer configurations that allow access to the SiteScope SOAP ports. Check if the SOAP port is bound to 0.0.0.0 (all interfaces) versus 127.0.0.1 (local only).
    Affected if The SOAP interface is reachable from untrusted networks or the internet

You are affected if HP SiteScope version 11.10, 11.11, or 11.12 is installed AND the SOAP feature is accessible, regardless of authentication settings since this vulnerability is exploitable without credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade HP SiteScope to a patched version beyond 11.12, or apply vendor-supplied patches. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to SiteScope SOAP interfaces and disable unnecessary services.

Fix this in Sitescope Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3263 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3263 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data