Globus ToolkitApplication · Globus

CVE-2012-3292

HIGH · 7.6 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-06-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.2.1 or later.
See remediation →
85/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The GridFTP in Globus Toolkit (GT) before 5.2.2, when certain autoconf macros are defined, does not properly check the return value from the getpwnam_r function, which might allow remote attackers to gain privileges by logging in with a user that does not exist, which causes GridFTP to run as the last user in the password file.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

GridFTP in Globus Toolkit before 5.2.2 fails to properly validate the return value from getpwnam_r() when certain autoconf macros are enabled. When a remote attacker logs in with a non-existent username, the function fails but the application does not reject the login—instead it runs as the last user entry in the password file, typically root or another privileged account.

MitigationUpgrade to Globus Toolkit 5.2.2 or later, which includes proper return value checking for getpwnam_r() to reject authentication attempts for non-existent users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Globus ToolkitApplication
Affected:<= 5.2.1= 2.0= 2.2= 2.4.3= 3.0.2= 3.2.1= 4.0.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.2= 4.0.3= 4.0.4= 4.0.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Complete
Integrity
Complete
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Globus Toolkit version
    Run 'globus-version' or check the installed packages (e.g., 'rpm -qa | grep globus' or 'dpkg -l | grep globus') to determine the exact version of Globus Toolkit installed on the system.
    Affected if The installed version is 5.2.1 or earlier, or one of the specific affected versions (2.0, 2.2, 2.4.3, 3.0.2, 3.2.1, 4.0.0-4.0.5).
  2. Confirm GridFTP component is present
    Check if GridFTP server is installed. Look for the 'globus-gridftp-server' package or binary (e.g., 'which globus-gridftp-server' or check package manager listings).
    Affected if GridFTP is installed and the Globus Toolkit version falls within the affected range.
  3. Check for vulnerable getpwnam_r usage
    Review GridFTP server configuration and logs for authentication handling. If accessible, examine the source code or binary for getpwnam_r() calls that do not check return values properly. Look for the presence of autoconf macro configurations related to user lookup.
    Affected if The code uses getpwnam_r() without proper return value validation and the autoconf macros that trigger the vulnerable code path are enabled.
  4. Test authentication with non-existent user
    Attempt to authenticate to the GridFTP server using a username that does not exist in the system's password database (e.g., using 'globus-url-copy' or an FTP client with a fake username). Monitor which user context the session runs under.
    Affected if The login succeeds and the session runs as a privileged user (such as root or the last entry in /etc/passwd), indicating the vulnerability is present and exploitable.

The environment is affected if GridFTP from Globus Toolkit version 5.2.1 or earlier (or one of the listed affected versions) is installed and allows a non-existent user to authenticate as a privileged account.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.2.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Globus Toolkit 5.2.2 or later, which includes proper return value checking for getpwnam_r() to reject authentication attempts for non-existent users.

Fix this in Globus Toolkit Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3292 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3292 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data