CVE-2012-3358
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple heap-based buffer overflows in the j2k_read_sot function in j2k.c in OpenJPEG 1.5 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted (1) tile number or (2) tile length in a JPEG 2000 image file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHeap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in OpenJPEG 1.5's j2k_read_sot function in j2k.c. The function fails to properly validate tile number and tile length values from JPEG 2000 image files before allocating or accessing heap buffers, allowing attackers to overflow allocated buffers with crafted input.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify OpenJPEG installation and versionRun 'openvolw --version' or check library file version (e.g., 'pkg-config --modversion openjpeg' or 'ldd <binary> | grep openjpeg')Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.5
-
Locate the vulnerable j2k.c fileFind OpenJPEG source or binary files (typically in /usr/include/openjpeg-1.5/ or similar) and verify j2k.c exists with the j2k_read_sot functionAffected if j2k.c with j2k_read_sot function is present in version 1.5
-
Determine if JPEG 2000 processing is enabledCheck application configuration or code for JPEG 2000 support (look for .jp2, .j2k, .j2c file handling or OpenJPEG library linking)Affected if The environment processes JPEG 2000 image files using OpenJPEG 1.5
-
Check for untrusted JPEG 2000 file inputReview logs, file upload mechanisms, or image processing pipelines that accept JPEG 2000 files from external sourcesAffected if Untrusted or user-supplied JPEG 2000 files are being processed by the OpenJPEG 1.5 library
You are affected if OpenJPEG version 1.5 is installed and processes JPEG 2000 files (including potentially untrusted ones) using the j2k_read_sot function in j2k.c.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate OpenJPEG to a patched version that includes proper bounds checking on tile number and tile length values in the j2k_read_sot function. Until patched, avoid processing untrusted JPEG 2000 files with OpenJPEG.
OpenJPEG 1.5.1 or later (preferably OpenJPEG 2.x stable release)
- 1. Identify all systems and applications that use OpenJPEG 1.5 library
- 2. Download the fixed OpenJPEG version (1.5.1 or later) from the official OpenJPEG repository or your Linux distribution's package manager
- 3. Replace the vulnerable libopenjpeg library files with the fixed version
- 4. Rebuild or restart any applications dynamically linked to OpenJPEG to ensure they load the patched library
- 5. Verify the patch was applied by checking the OpenJPEG version (e.g., using `opj_version` command or checking library version)
- 6. Test that JPEG 2000 image processing still functions correctly with the updated library
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3358 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3358 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data