CVE-2012-3401
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe t2p_read_tiff_init function in tiff2pdf (tools/tiff2pdf.c) in LibTIFF 4.0.2 and earlier does not properly initialize the T2P context struct pointer in certain error conditions, which allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe t2p_read_tiff_init function in LibTIFF's tiff2pdf tool (tools/tiff2pdf.c) versions 4.0.2 and earlier fails to properly initialize the T2P context struct pointer under certain error conditions. This leads to a heap-based buffer overflow when processing crafted TIFF images, enabling denial of service (crash) and potentially arbitrary code execution by context-dependent attackers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 4.0.2= 3.4= 3.5.1= 3.5.2= 3.5.3= 3.5.4= 3.5.5= 3.5.6= 3.5.7= 3.6.0= 3.6.1= 3.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if tiff2pdf is installedRun 'tiff2pdf -v' or 'which tiff2pdf' to locate the binary and obtain its version informationAffected if tiff2pdf is present and its version matches 4.0.2 or earlier, or any of these: 3.4, 3.5.1, 3.5.2, 3.5.3, 3.5.4, 3.5.5, 3.5.6, 3.5.7, 3.6.0, 3.6.1, 3.7.0
-
Check LibTIFF library versionRun 'pkg-config --modversion libtiff-4' or 'ldd $(which tiff2pdf)' to identify the linked LibTIFF library version, or query your package manager for the installed libtiff package versionAffected if The LibTIFF library version is 4.0.2 or lower, or matches any of the affected versions listed
-
Identify tiff2pdf usage in your environmentSearch for scripts, cron jobs, or applications that invoke tiff2pdf by running 'grep -r tiff2pdf /etc /opt /home' or reviewing application code that processes TIFF filesAffected if tiff2pdf is used to process TIFF images, especially from untrusted or external sources
-
Inspect TIFF processing workflowsReview any web services, file upload handlers, or document conversion pipelines that accept TIFF input and invoke tiff2pdfAffected if TIFF files from untrusted sources are processed through tiff2pdf without prior validation or sandboxing
You are affected if tiff2pdf is installed and used to process TIFF images, and the LibTIFF version is 4.0.2 or earlier (including all 3.x versions listed), especially when handling untrusted TIFF files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade LibTIFF to a version newer than 4.0.2 which contains the fix. Until then, avoid processing untrusted TIFF images with tiff2pdf and implement input validation on TIFF files.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3401 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- libjpeg-turbo.svn.sourceforge.net
- lists.opensuse.org
- osvdb.org
- rhn.redhat.com
- secunia.com
- security.gentoo.org
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.openwall.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.ubuntu.com
- www.xerox.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- bugzilla.redhat.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3401 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data