CVE-2012-3684
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWebKit, as used in Apple iTunes before 10.7, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via a crafted web site, a different vulnerability than other WebKit CVEs listed in APPLE-SA-2012-09-12-1.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in WebKit, as used in Apple iTunes before version 10.7, allows remote attackers to achieve arbitrary code execution or cause a denial of service via a crafted website. The vulnerability stems from improper memory handling during webpage rendering.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 10.6.3= 4.0.0= 4.0.1= 4.1.0= 4.2.0= 4.5= 4.5.0= 4.6= 4.6.0= 4.7= 4.7.0= 4.7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm iTunes installationCheck if Apple iTunes is installed on the system. On Windows, look in Program Files or check the registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\App Paths\iTunes.exe. On macOS, check /Applications for iTunes.app.Affected if iTunes is not installed on the system (not affected)
-
Determine installed iTunes versionOn Windows, right-click iTunes in the Start menu and select Properties, or open iTunes and go to Help > About iTunes. On macOS, open iTunes and go to iTunes > About iTunes. Note the full version number displayed.Affected if Unable to determine version (further investigation needed)
-
Compare version against affected listCompare your installed version to the following affected versions: 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.1.0, 4.2.0, 4.5, 4.5.0, 4.6, 4.6.0, 4.7, 4.7.0, 4.7.1, or any version 10.6.3 or earlier.Affected if Your installed version matches or is older than any version on the affected list (you are likely affected)
-
Verify WebKit component exposureThis vulnerability is triggered through the WebKit rendering engine when iTunes opens web content. The flaw requires iTunes to process webpage content.Affected if iTunes processes or displays web content (the attack surface exists)
If iTunes is installed and the version matches any of the affected versions (4.x series or 10.6.3 and earlier), the system is vulnerable to remote code execution via malicious websites opened through iTunes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Apple iTunes to version 10.7 or later to address the vulnerability. As a defense-in-depth measure, restrict user access to untrusted websites and consider using browser protection tools.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3684 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3684 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data