CVE-2012-3899
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedsensorApp on Cisco IPS 4200 series sensors 6.0, 6.2, and 7.0 does not properly allocate memory, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and process crash, and traffic-inspection outage) via network traffic, aka Bug ID CSCtn23051.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe sensorApp component on Cisco IPS 4200 series sensors versions 6.0, 6.2, and 7.0 contains a memory allocation flaw. Remote attackers can send specially crafted network traffic to trigger improper memory handling, resulting in memory corruption, process crash, and a complete traffic-inspection outage.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.0= 6.2= 7.0all versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your Cisco IPS sensor modelLog into the sensor CLI and run 'show version' or check the hardware label to confirm the model number (e.g., IPS 4240, IPS 4250, IPS 4260)Affected if The model is any of: 4240, 4250 Sx, 4255, 4260, or 4270 20 (all versions are affected)
-
Check the installed IPS software versionFrom the sensor CLI, run 'show version' and locate the software version number (e.g., 6.0, 6.2, 7.0)Affected if The version is 6.0, 6.2, or 7.0 exactly, or any version on models 4240, 4250 Sx, 4255, 4260, 4270 20
-
Verify the sensorApp component is activeFrom the sensor CLI, run 'show process' or 'show module' to confirm the sensorApp process is runningAffected if sensorApp is running and processing traffic (the flaw triggers when this component handles specially crafted packets)
-
Confirm remote access is enabled on the sensorCheck the sensor interface configuration with 'show interface' and verify management access settings with 'show running-config' for any externally accessible interfacesAffected if The sensor has an active data or management interface accepting network traffic from untrusted networks (this is required for remote attackers to send the malicious packets)
You are affected if you run any Cisco IPS 4200 series sensor (especially models 4240, 4250 Sx, 4255, 4260, 4270 20) on software versions 6.0, 6.2, or 7.0, or any version on those specific models, and the sensorApp component is actively processing network traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco patch for Bug ID CSCtn23051, which involves upgrading to a fixed IPS software version. Schedule maintenance windows to minimize disruption and verify sensor functionality after applying the update.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3899 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3899 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data