Identity Services Engine SoftwareApplication · Cisco

CVE-2012-3908

MEDIUM · 6.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-09-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
77/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the ISE Administrator user interface (aka the Apache Tomcat interface) on Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) 3300 series appliances before 1.1.0.665 Cumulative Patch 1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators, aka Bug ID CSCty46684.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities exist in the ISE Administrator web interface (Apache Tomcat) on Cisco Identity Services Engine 3300 series appliances. These flaws allow remote attackers to trick authenticated administrators into unknowingly executing malicious requests, effectively hijacking their session credentials to perform unauthorized administrative actions.

MitigationApply Cisco ISE version 1.1.0.665 Cumulative Patch 1 or later to address the CSRF vulnerabilities. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens and SameSite cookie attributes as defense-in-depth measures.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Identity Services Engine SoftwareApplication
Affected:= 1.0= 1.0.4= 1.0mr= 1.1= 1.1.1
Identity Services EngineHardware / appliance
Affected:= 3300

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Cisco ISE is installed
    Log into the ISE CLI or access the admin web interface. Run 'show version' in the CLI or check the login page footer for the version number.
    Affected if The system is running Cisco Identity Services Engine software on a 3300 series appliance.
  2. Determine the installed ISE version
    In the ISE admin web interface, navigate to Administration > System > Settings > Product Version, or run 'show version' via CLI and note the full version string.
    Affected if The installed version matches 1.0, 1.0.4, 1.0mr, 1.1, or 1.1.1 exactly.
  3. Verify the admin web interface is enabled
    Access the ISE admin portal URL (typically https://<ise-host>/admin/) in a browser. Confirm the login page loads successfully.
    Affected if The administrator web interface is accessible and responds, which is required for the CSRF attack vector to be viable.
  4. Check for anti-CSRF protections in HTTP headers
    Using browser developer tools or curl, inspect the HTTP response headers from the ISE admin login page for SameSite cookie attributes and any anti-CSRF token mechanisms.
    Affected if No SameSite cookie attributes or anti-CSRF token headers are present in the admin interface responses.

The environment is affected if Cisco ISE version 1.0, 1.0.4, 1.0mr, 1.1, or 1.1.1 is installed on a 3300 series appliance and the administrator web interface is accessible without CSRF protections.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply Cisco ISE version 1.1.0.665 Cumulative Patch 1 or later to address the CSRF vulnerabilities. Additionally, implement anti-CSRF tokens and SameSite cookie attributes as defense-in-depth measures.

Fix this in Identity Services Engine Software Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,480
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-3908 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-3908 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data