CVE-2012-4301
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnspecified vulnerability in the JavaFX component in Oracle Java SE JavaFX 2.2.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than other CVEs listed in the February 2013 CPU. NOTE: the previous information is from the February 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a third party that this issue allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an "invalid type case" in the init method of the D3DShader class in the com.sun.prism.d3d package. CPU.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical vulnerability in Oracle Java SE JavaFX 2.2.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via an 'invalid type case' in the init method of the D3DShader class within the com.sun.prism.d3d package. This enables complete compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.2.4= 2.0= 2.0.2= 2.0.3= 2.1= 2.2= 2.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if JavaFX is installed on the systemOn Windows, check for JavaFX installation by looking for javafx*.jar files in the Java installation directory (e.g., C:\Program Files\Java\jre7\lib\ or C:\Program Files\Oracle\), or check the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\JavaFX for the property "Version" or "PathToHome". On Linux/Unix, check /usr/share/java/ or the Java home lib directory for javafx*.jar files.Affected if JavaFX is present on the system with a version matching 2.0, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.2.3, or any version <= 2.2.4
-
Verify the installed JavaFX version numberIf using Windows Registry, query the "Version" string value under HKLM\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft\JavaFX. If the JAR file is found, check the manifest file inside javafx*.jar for the Implementation-Version attribute, or use the command: java -jar javafx.jar to invoke and query the version via Java code.Affected if The installed version is 2.2.4 or any version 2.0 through 2.2.3, or any version <= 2.2.4
-
Confirm the D3D rendering pipeline is in useThis vulnerability exists in the D3DShader class within com.sun.prism.d3d package, which is used only on Windows systems with Direct3D rendering. Check if the JavaFX application or runtime is configured to use the D3D pipeline. This can be verified by examining JavaFX runtime logs with debug tracing enabled (set JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS="-Dprism.verbose=true") or by checking if the application runs on a Windows platform with hardware acceleration enabled.Affected if The system is Windows-based and JavaFX is using the D3D (Direct3D) rendering pipeline, which is the default on Windows for JavaFX 2.x versions.
A system is affected if it runs any Windows version of JavaFX 2.2.4 or earlier (versions 2.0 through 2.2.3 or any version <= 2.2.4) with D3D rendering enabled, which is the default on Windows.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the February 2013 Critical Patch Update to upgrade JavaFX beyond version 2.2.4, or update to a patched JDK version that addresses this vulnerability.
Latest JavaFX 2.x or migrate to Java SE 7u6+ which includes bundled JavaFX
- 1. Identify all deployments and systems running JavaFX versions 2.0, 2.0.2, 2.0.3, or 2.2.4 and earlier.
- 2. Check Oracle's official February 2013 Critical Patch Update (CPU) advisory for JavaFX security fixes.
- 3. Upgrade JavaFX to the latest version available from Oracle's official JavaFX download pages or via your Java SE subscription.
- 4. Alternatively, upgrade to Java SE 7 update 15 or later (which bundles fixed JavaFX components) as Oracle integrated JavaFX into the JDK starting with Java SE 7u6.
- 5. After upgrading, test all JavaFX applications to ensure functionality is preserved.
- 6. Verify the fix by confirming the JavaFX version number matches a release dated after February 2013.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4301 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4301 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data