CVE-2012-4351
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInteger overflow in pgpwded.sys in Symantec PGP Desktop 10.x and Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 before MP1 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAn integer overflow vulnerability exists in the pgpwded.sys kernel driver of Symantec PGP Desktop 10.x and Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 before MP1. The flaw allows a local attacker to execute a specially crafted application to escalate privileges to kernel level.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.3.0= 10.0.0= 10.0.1= 10.0.2= 10.0.3= 10.1.0= 10.1.1= 10.1.2= 10.2.0= 10.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Symantec Encryption Desktop or PGP Desktop is installedOpen Control Panel and look for 'Symantec Encryption Desktop' or 'PGP Desktop' in the programs list, or check the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\PGP Corporation\ or C:\Program Files\Symantec\Encryption Desktop\)Affected if Either product is listed in installed programs
-
Verify the installed version numberRight-click the program in Control Panel and select 'Properties', or check the version in the application's 'About' dialog. Compare against affected versions: Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 or PGP Desktop 10.0.0 through 10.2.1Affected if The installed version matches exactly 10.3.0 for Encryption Desktop, or any version from 10.0.0 to 10.2.1 for PGP Desktop
-
Locate the pgpwded.sys driver fileSearch for pgpwded.sys in the Windows System32\drivers folder or in the product installation directory (C:\Windows\System32\drivers\pgpwded.sys or within the PGP installation folder)Affected if The pgpwded.sys file exists on the system
-
Check if the pgpwded.sys driver is loadedOpen Command Prompt and run 'sc query pgpwded' or check Device Manager for the driver under 'Non-Plug and Play Drivers'Affected if The driver is present and loaded/running
A user is affected if they have Symantec Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 or PGP Desktop versions 10.0.0 through 10.2.1 installed with the pgpwded.sys driver present on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch by upgrading to Symantec Encryption Desktop 10.3.0 MP1 or later, or apply all subsequent security updates.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4351 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4351 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data