GeglApplication

CVE-2012-4433

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-11-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Multiple integer overflows in operations/external/ppm-load.c in GEGL (Generic Graphics Library) 0.2.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a large (1) width or (2) height value in a Portable Pixel Map (ppm) image, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Integer overflows in GEGL's PPM image loader allow attackers to trigger heap-based buffer overflows by crafting PPM files with excessively large width or height values. The overflow occurs when the multiplication of width/height dimensions exceeds integer limits, resulting in undersized buffer allocation and subsequent memory corruption.

MitigationUpdate GEGL to a version that properly validates image dimensions before buffer allocation, or implement explicit integer overflow checks in ppm-load.c to reject width/height values that would cause allocation size overflows.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
GeglApplication
Affected:= 0.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check if GEGL library is installed
    Run 'pkg-config --modversion gegl' or use system package manager to query for gegl package (dpkg -l | grep gegl, rpm -qa | grep gegl, etc.)
    Affected if GEGL is not installed - the vulnerability does not apply; if installed, note the returned version for next check
  2. Verify GEGL version is 0.2.0
    Compare the installed GEGL version from previous step to version 0.2.0 exactly
    Affected if Installed version equals 0.2.0 - this specific version is affected by CVE-2012-4433; versions other than 0.2.0 are not affected by this specific CVE
  3. Confirm PPM image loader is present
    Check for GEGL's PPM plugin by examining the GeglBuffer plugin directory (typically /usr/lib/gegl-0.2/plugins/ or similar path containing ppm-load.*)
    Affected if PPM loader plugin exists and is loadable - the vulnerable code path in ppm-load.c can be triggered when loading PPM files
  4. Identify if PPM files are processed
    Audit system or application logs, workflow documentation, or file processing patterns to determine if PPM format images are loaded by any GEGL-using application
    Affected if Applications or users process PPM files, particularly from external or untrusted sources - crafted PPM files with malicious dimensions could trigger the integer overflow

A system is affected only if GEGL version 0.2.0 is installed AND the PPM image loader is accessible AND the system processes PPM files that could be crafted with oversized dimensions to trigger the buffer overflow.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update GEGL to a version that properly validates image dimensions before buffer allocation, or implement explicit integer overflow checks in ppm-load.c to reject width/height values that would cause allocation size overflows.

Fix this in Gegl Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4433 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4433 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data