Rslinx EnterpriseHardware / appliance · Rockwellautomation

CVE-2012-4695

HIGH · 7.1 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-04-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
LogReceiver.exe in Rockwell Automation RSLinx Enterprise CPR9, CPR9-SR1, CPR9-SR2, CPR9-SR3, CPR9-SR4, CPR9-SR5, CPR9-SR5.1, and CPR9-SR6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (service outage) via a zero-byte UDP packet that is not properly handled by Logger.dll.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

LogReceiver.exe in Rockwell Automation RSLinx Enterprise fails to properly validate zero-byte UDP packets in Logger.dll, causing the service to crash and remain unavailable. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable via network access to the affected service's UDP port.

MitigationApply network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict UDP traffic to RSLinx Enterprise components from untrusted sources. Contact Rockwell Automation for available patches or firmware updates addressing this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Rslinx EnterpriseHardware / appliance
Affected:= cpr9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
M
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed RSLinx Enterprise version
    Locate RSLinx Enterprise installation and check its version information. This may be found in Windows Programs and Features, the installation directory, or the application's About/Help dialog. Compare the version to the affected version: cpr9.
    Affected if The installed version of RSLinx Enterprise is exactly cpr9.
  2. Confirm RSLinx Enterprise UDP service is running
    Check if the LogReceiver.exe process or related RSLinx Enterprise services are actively running on the system. Use Task Manager or command 'tasklist /FI "IMAGENAME eq LogReceiver.exe"' to list running instances.
    Affected if LogReceiver.exe or associated RSLinx Enterprise services are running and listening for UDP connections.
  3. Identify open UDP ports used by RSLinx Enterprise
    Use 'netstat -an | findstr UDP' to list all listening UDP ports on the system. Identify which UDP port RSLinx Enterprise uses for its logging/receiver service. Cross-reference with any documentation or network scans of the environment.
    Affected if RSLinx Enterprise has a UDP port open and listening for network traffic.
  4. Assess network exposure of the UDP service
    Review firewall rules, network segmentation, and ACLs to determine whether untrusted network sources can send UDP packets to the RSLinx Enterprise server. Use 'netsh advfirewall firewall show rule name=all' or check border firewall configurations.
    Affected if The UDP port used by RSLinx Enterprise is accessible from untrusted network segments or external addresses.

You are affected if RSLinx Enterprise version cpr9 is installed, its UDP service is running and network-accessible, and untrusted network sources can send packets to that UDP port.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply network segmentation and firewall rules to restrict UDP traffic to RSLinx Enterprise components from untrusted sources. Contact Rockwell Automation for available patches or firmware updates addressing this vulnerability.

Fix this in Rslinx Enterprise Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,330
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4695 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4695 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data