Codesys Gateway ServerApplication · 3s Software

CVE-2012-4706

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-02-24
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.3.9.20 or later.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Integer signedness error in 3S CODESYS Gateway-Server before 2.3.9.27 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted packet that triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Integer signedness error in 3S CODESYS Gateway-Server allows remote attackers to trigger a heap-based buffer overflow via crafted packets, causing denial of service. The vulnerability stems from incorrect handling of integer types when calculating buffer sizes, leading to undersized memory allocations.

MitigationUpgrade CODESYS Gateway-Server to version 2.3.9.27 or later. Apply network segmentation to isolate the gateway server from untrusted networks and implement ingress filtering on affected ports.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Codesys Gateway ServerApplication
Affected:<= 2.3.9.20= 2.3.5.1= 2.3.5.2= 2.3.5.3= 2.3.6.0= 2.3.7.0= 2.3.8.0= 2.3.8.1= 2.3.8.2= 2.3.9= 2.3.9.1= 2.3.9.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the Codesys Gateway Server installation
    Check common installation paths such as C:\Program Files\3S Software\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\3S Software\ for the Gateway Server directory, or look for the service named 'CodesysGatewayServer' in Windows Services.
    Affected if The Gateway Server software is installed on the system.
  2. Determine the installed Gateway Server version
    Open the Gateway Server installation directory and locate the executable file (typically 'GatewayServer.exe' or similar), then right-click and select Properties to view the File Version, or check the software's About/Version information within the CODESYS interface.
    Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected versions listed: <= 2.3.9.20, or exactly 2.3.5.1, 2.3.5.2, 2.3.5.3, 2.3.6.0, 2.3.7.0, 2.3.8.0, 2.3.8.1, 2.3.8.2, 2.3.9, 2.3.9.1, or 2.3.9.2.
  3. Verify the Gateway Server service is running
    Open Windows Services (services.msc) and look for 'Codesys Gateway Server' or '3S CODESYS Gateway Server', or run 'netstat -an | findstr 1217' to check if the default gateway port (1217/tcp) is listening.
    Affected if The Gateway Server service is running and listening on network ports, making it accessible to remote attackers.
  4. Assess network exposure of the gateway service
    Run 'netstat -an' or use a network scanner to determine if port 1217 (default CODESYS Gateway port) is bound to an external IP address or is accessible from untrusted network segments.
    Affected if The gateway port is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet without firewall protection.

You are affected if the Codesys Gateway Server is installed with a version matching <= 2.3.9.20 or any of the specific versions 2.3.5.1 through 2.3.9.2, and the service is running and accessible over the network.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.3.9.20
Interim mitigation

Upgrade CODESYS Gateway-Server to version 2.3.9.27 or later. Apply network segmentation to isolate the gateway server from untrusted networks and implement ingress filtering on affected ports.

Fix this in Codesys Gateway Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4706 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4706 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data