CVE-2012-4822
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple unspecified vulnerabilities in the JRE component in IBM Java 7 SR2 and earlier, Java 6.0.1 SR3 and earlier, Java 6 SR11 and earlier, Java 5 SR14 and earlier, and Java 142 SR13 FP13 and earlier; as used in IBM Rational Host On-Demand, Rational Change, Tivoli Monitoring, Smart Analytics System 5600, Tivoli Remote Control 5.1.2, WebSphere Real Time, Lotus Notes & Domino, Tivoli Storage Productivity Center, and Service Deliver Manager; and other products from other vendors such as Red Hat, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via vectors related to "insecure use [of] multiple methods in the java.lang.class class."
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis CVE involves multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in IBM Java JRE (versions 7 SR2 and earlier, 6.0.1 SR3 and earlier, 6 SR11 and earlier, 5 SR14 and earlier, and 142 SR13 FP13 and earlier) that allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code through insecure use of methods in the java.lang.Class class. The vulnerability affects numerous IBM products including Rational Host On-Demand, Tivoli Monitoring, Lotus Notes & Domino, and WebSphere Real Time.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.4.2, <= 1.4.2.13.13>= 5.0.0.0, <= 5.0.14.0>= 6.0.0.0, <= 6.0.11.0>= 7.0.0.0, <= 7.0.2.0= 8.0= 8.0.1= 8.0.2= 8.0.2.1= 8.0.2.2= 8.0.2.3= 8.0.2.4= 8.5.0= 8.5.0.1= 8.5.1= 8.5.1.1= 8.5.1.2= 8.0= 8.0.0= 8.0.1= 8.0.2= 8.0.2.0= 8.0.2.1= 8.0.2.2= 8.0.2.3= 8.0.2.4= 8.0.2.5= 8.0.2.6= 8.5= 8.0.80407= 8.0.80822= 8.5.1.20100709-1631= 8.0= 8.0.1= 8.0.1.2= 8.0.1.3= 8.5.0.0= 8.5.0.1= 8.5.0.2= 8.5.1.1= 8.5.1.2= 8.5.1.3= 8.5.2.1= 8.5.3= 4.7= 5.1= 5.2= 5.3= 1.6.0.12= 8.0.8.0= 9.0.8.0= 10.0.9.0= 10.0.10.0= 11.0.3.0= 11.0.4.0= 11.0.5.0= 11.0.5.1= 11.0.6.0= 11.0.6.1= 7.2.1.0= 7.2.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Java installationRun 'java -version' or check for IBM Java installations in common paths like /opt/ibm/java or the system PATH. Look for 'IBM' or 'J9' in the version output.Affected if IBM Java is present and the output shows IBM in the vendor string
-
Determine IBM Java version numberRun 'java -fullversion' or 'java -version' to obtain the exact version string. For IBM Java 5, 6, and 7, note the SR (Service Release) number. For Java 1.4.2, note the FP (Fix Pack) level.Affected if Version falls within: 1.4.2 to 1.4.2.13.13, 5.0.0.0 to 5.0.14.0, 6.0.0.0 to 6.0.11.0, or 7.0.0.0 to 7.0.2.0
-
Check for vulnerable IBM productsList installed IBM products on the system. For Lotus products, check the About or Version information in the application. For Rational Host On-Demand, check the installed version in the program's properties.Affected if One of these products is installed: Lotus Domino (8.0-8.5.1.2), Lotus Notes (8.0-8.5), Lotus Notes Sametime (8.0.80407, 8.0.80822, 8.5.1), Lotus Notes Traveler (8.0-8.5.3), Rational Change (4.7-5.3), Rational Host On-Demand (1.6.0.12, 8.0.8.0-11.0.6.1), or Service Delivery Manager (7.2.1.0-7.2.2.0)
-
Verify Java is enabled in the affected applicationFor Lotus Notes and Domino, check the Java debugger settings or any custom Java agents. For Rational Host On-Demand, verify if Java applets or embedded Java features are enabled.Affected if Java is enabled or available to remote attackers in any of the affected applications
You are affected if IBM Java is installed and its version falls within the vulnerable ranges, OR if any of the listed IBM products are installed without corresponding security patches applied.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM Java security patches to upgrade to patched versions of the JRE, or disable Java in affected systems if patches are unavailable. Given the critical CVSS score of 9.3 and remote code execution capability, prioritize patching affected systems immediately.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-4822 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-01.ibm.com
- www-304.ibm.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- rhn.redhat.com
- seclists.org
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- secunia.com
- www.securityfocus.com
- exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-4822 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data