Optima PlcApplication · Optimalog

CVE-2012-5048

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-09-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.5.2 or later.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
APIFTP Server in Optimalog Optima PLC 1.5.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and daemon crash) via a crafted packet.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The APIFTP Server component in Optimalog Optima PLC versions 1.5.2 and earlier contains a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability when processing malformed network packets, causing the service to crash and resulting in denial of service. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without authentication via specially crafted packets sent to the FTP server service.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied updates for Optimalog Optima PLC to patch the APIFTP Server vulnerability. If no patch is available, network segmentation and firewall rules should restrict access to the PLC management interfaces to minimize exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Optima PlcApplication
Affected:<= 1.5.2= 1.4.9= 1.4.10= 1.5.0= 1.5.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Complete

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Optimalog Optima PLC is running in the environment
    Review installed software, running services, or network scans to locate any instance of Optimalog Optima PLC. Check for services listening on FTP ports (21/tcp) that may correspond to the APIFTP Server component.
    Affected if Optimalog Optima PLC software is present on any system in the environment
  2. Determine the installed version of Optima PLC
    Locate the software version through the PLC management interface, program files directory, or system inventory. Compare the discovered version against the affected ranges: <= 1.5.2, or specifically 1.4.9, 1.4.10, 1.5.0, or 1.5.1.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.5.2 or earlier, specifically including any of 1.4.9, 1.4.10, 1.5.0, 1.5.1, or 1.5.2
  3. Verify if the APIFTP Server component is enabled
    Access the PLC configuration or management interface and check whether the APIFTP Server service or module is activated. This component handles FTP connections and is required for the vulnerability to be exploitable.
    Affected if The APIFTP Server component is running or enabled on the PLC device
  4. Assess network accessibility of the FTP service
    Identify which network interfaces and IP addresses the FTP service is bound to. Determine if the FTP port (21/tcp) is exposed to untrusted networks, including the internet, or accessible from other VLANs/segments beyond the PLC operations network.
    Affected if The FTP service is accessible from networks beyond the trusted PLC management network, particularly from untrusted or external networks

A system is affected if it runs Optimalog Optima PLC version 1.5.2 or earlier with the APIFTP Server component enabled and exposed to network traffic.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.5.2
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied updates for Optimalog Optima PLC to patch the APIFTP Server vulnerability. If no patch is available, network segmentation and firewall rules should restrict access to the PLC management interfaces to minimize exposure.

Fix this in Optima Plc Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5048 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5048 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data