CVE-2012-5476
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWithin the RHOS Essex Preview (2012.2) of the OpenStack dashboard package, the file /etc/quantum/quantum.conf is world readable which exposes the admin password and token value.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe OpenStack Quantum configuration file /etc/quantum/quantum.conf is set with world-readable permissions (644), allowing any local user to read the file and obtain the admin password and authentication token. This exposes sensitive credentials used for administrative operations within the Quantum (Neutron) networking service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 8.0= 9.0= 10.0= 2012.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate the Quantum configuration fileSearch for quantum.conf in common locations: ls -la /etc/quantum/quantum.conf or find /etc -name quantum.conf 2>/dev/nullAffected if The file /etc/quantum/quantum.conf exists on the system
-
Check file permissions on quantum.confRun: ls -la /etc/quantum/quantum.conf and examine the permission bits (first column)Affected if Permissions show any permission for 'others' (the last three bits contain 'r--', 'r-w', or 'r-x')
-
Verify world-readable accessRun: stat -c '%a' /etc/quantum/quantum.conf to get the octal permissions, or test with: python3 -c 'import os; print(oct(os.stat("/etc/quantum/quantum.conf").st_mode)[-3:])'Affected if The last digit of the octal permission is not 0 (e.g., 644, 664, 666)
-
Confirm other users can read the fileRun: cat /etc/quantum/quantum.conf as a non-root, non-quantum user (e.g., su -c 'cat /etc/quantum/quantum.conf' someuser)Affected if The command successfully reads and displays file contents without permission denied error
If /etc/quantum/quantum.conf exists and has permissions that allow any user besides root and the quantum service user to read it (e.g., 644 or wider), the system is affected by this vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataChange file permissions on /etc/quantum/quantum.conf to restrict read access (e.g., chmod 640 or 600) and ensure only the quantum service user and root can access it, then verify the Quantum service continues to function properly.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5476 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5476 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data