CVE-2012-5484
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe client in FreeIPA 2.x and 3.x before 3.1.2 does not properly obtain the Certification Authority (CA) certificate from the server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof a join procedure via a crafted certificate.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe FreeIPA client before version 3.1.2 fails to properly validate the CA certificate during the join procedure, allowing man-in-the-middle attackers to inject crafted certificates and spoof the IPA server during client enrollment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.0.0= 2.0.1= 2.1.0= 2.1.1= 2.1.3= 2.1.4= 2.2.1= 3.0.0= 3.0.1= 3.0.2= 3.1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- M
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed FreeIPA client versionRun 'rpm -q freeipa-client' or 'ipa --version' to determine the installed FreeIPA client package versionAffected if The version matches any of the following: 2.0.0, 2.0.1, 2.1.0, 2.1.1, 2.1.3, 2.1.4, 2.2.1, 3.0.0, 3.0.1, 3.0.2, or 3.1.1
-
Verify client enrollment statusCheck if the host is already enrolled with the IPA server by running 'ipa host-show $(hostname)' or looking for /etc/ipa/default.conf configurationAffected if The client is being enrolled for the first time or is being re-enrolled with an affected version
-
Check for active or recent join operationsReview system logs in /var/log/ipa* or run 'ipa-join' to see if a join is in progress or has been attempted recentlyAffected if A join operation has been performed or is pending with an affected client version
A system is affected if it runs a FreeIPA client version 3.1.1 or earlier and is currently performing or will perform a join/enrollment operation to the IPA server.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade FreeIPA client to version 3.1.2 or later which implements proper CA certificate validation. For systems that cannot be upgraded immediately, ensure join operations occur only over trusted networks or implement out-of-band certificate fingerprint verification.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing10.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5484 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5484 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data