BabygekkoApplication

CVE-2012-5699

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-01-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.2.4 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
BabyGekko before 1.2.4 allows PHP file inclusion.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

BabyGekko before version 1.2.4 contains a PHP file inclusion vulnerability that allows remote attackers to include arbitrary PHP files, likely leading to remote code execution. The critical CVSS score (9.8) indicates the vulnerability is exploitable remotely without authentication.

MitigationUpgrade BabyGekko to version 1.2.4 or later to remediate the file inclusion vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
BabygekkoApplication
Affected:< 1.2.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate BabyGekko installation directory
    Search for BabyGekko files on the web server. Common locations include /var/www/, /htdocs/, or the document root. Look for folders containing 'babygekko' or 'babygekko' in file names, particularly index.php or admin.php files.
    Affected if BabyGekko files are found on the server
  2. Identify installed BabyGekko version
    Open the main index.php or a core configuration file in the BabyGekko directory. Search for a version string such as 'version', '$version', or 'VERSION' defined as a constant or variable. Common places include index.php, version.php, or config.php in the BabyGekko root folder.
    Affected if A version number lower than 1.2.4 is displayed or defined in the files
  3. Verify exact version number against affected range
    Compare the discovered version to 1.2.4. If the version is expressed as '1.2.3', '1.2.3b', or any release prior to 1.2.4, the installation falls within the vulnerable range.
    Affected if Version is below 1.2.4 (for example: 1.2.3, 1.2.2, 1.2.1, etc.)
  4. Confirm web application is accessible
    Attempt to access the BabyGekko homepage or admin panel via HTTP/HTTPS to confirm the application is deployed and reachable. The file inclusion flaw is exploitable remotely if the application is exposed.
    Affected if The BabyGekko application responds to web requests

If BabyGekko is installed with a version lower than 1.2.4 and is accessible over the network, the environment is affected by CVE-2012-5699.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.2.4 or later
Fixed in 1.2.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade BabyGekko to version 1.2.4 or later to remediate the file inclusion vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

BabyGekko 1.2.4

  1. Obtain the latest version of BabyGekko (version 1.2.4 or later) from the official vendor or trusted distribution source
  2. Backup the existing BabyGekko installation including all files and the database
  3. Replace the existing BabyGekko files with the files from version 1.2.4
  4. Verify the installation by accessing the web application
  5. Confirm the PHP file inclusion vulnerability is no longer present

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Babygekko Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5699 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5699 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data