TomcatWeb server / proxy · Apache

CVE-2012-5885

MEDIUM · 5.0 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-11-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
59/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The replay-countermeasure functionality in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 tracks cnonce (aka client nonce) values instead of nonce (aka server nonce) and nc (aka nonce-count) values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The HTTP Digest Access Authentication replay countermeasure in Apache Tomcat tracks client nonce (cnonce) values instead of server nonce (nonce) and nonce-count (nc), allowing attackers to capture valid authenticated requests and replay them to bypass authentication.

MitigationUpgrade Apache Tomcat to version 5.5.36, 6.0.36, 7.0.30 or later to obtain the corrected replay-countermeasure implementation that properly tracks nonce and nc values.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TomcatWeb server / proxy
Affected:= 5.5.0= 5.5.1= 5.5.2= 5.5.3= 5.5.4= 5.5.5= 5.5.6= 5.5.7= 5.5.8= 5.5.9= 5.5.10= 5.5.11

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
None
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache Tomcat version
    Locate the Tomcat installation directory (check CATALINA_HOME environment variable or common paths like /opt/tomcat, /usr/share/tomcat, C:\Tomcat). Within the installation, find the version by examining the RELEASE-NOTES file in the docs folder, or run the version.sh/version.bat script in the bin directory, or check the catalina.jar manifest.
    Affected if The installed version is any of: 5.5.0, 5.5.1, 5.5.2, 5.5.3, 5.5.4, 5.5.5, 5.5.6, 5.5.7, 5.5.8, 5.5.9, 5.5.10, or 5.5.11.
  2. Verify HTTP Digest Authentication is configured
    Examine the conf/server.xml file in the Tomcat installation. Look for a <Realm> element with the digest attribute set, or for web.xml files containing <auth-method>DIGEST</auth-method> in the <login-config> section.
    Affected if HTTP Digest Access Authentication is enabled (either through Realm digest configuration or web.xml login-config) AND the Tomcat version falls within the affected 5.5.x range.
  3. Confirm nonce tracking implementation in use
    Review application web.xml deployment descriptors for any web resources protected by the digest authentication method. Check whether the protected resources accept and process Digest authentication challenges.
    Affected if The vulnerable Tomcat version is running and serving applications that rely on Digest authentication for protected resources, making replay attacks possible.

You are affected if Apache Tomcat version 5.5.0 through 5.5.11 is installed and HTTP Digest Access Authentication is configured for protecting resources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Apache Tomcat to version 5.5.36, 6.0.36, 7.0.30 or later to obtain the corrected replay-countermeasure implementation that properly tracks nonce and nc values.

Fix this in Tomcat Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5885 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5885 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data