B2evolutionApplication

CVE-2012-5910

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v2.0 Published 2012-11-17
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SQL injection vulnerability in blogs/htsrv/viewfile.php in b2evolution 4.1.3 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the root parameter.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in b2evolution CMS 4.1.3's viewfile.php allows authenticated users to execute arbitrary SQL commands through the unsanitized 'root' parameter.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of b2evolution; if unavailable, implement prepared statements/parameterized queries for the root parameter in viewfile.php.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
B2evolutionApplication
Affected:= 4.1.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
Single
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
Partial

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm b2evolution CMS installation
    Locate b2evolution files by searching for characteristic directories like /b2evolution/ or /blogs/, or look for b2evolution-specific files such as /b2evolution/index.php, /b2evolution/inc/_core/_config.php, or other core b2evolution files in the web root.
    Affected if No b2evolution installation is found, then this CVE does not apply.
  2. Identify b2evolution version
    Check the installed b2evolution version by examining version files (such as _version.php in the b2evolution root directory), or view the HTML source of any b2evolution page for a version comment in the meta tags.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 4.1.3.
  3. Locate viewfile.php
    Search for the file viewfile.php in the b2evolution installation directory, typically found in the root or in the /htsrv/ directory of the b2evolution web path.
    Affected if viewfile.php exists in the b2evolution installation.
  4. Verify root parameter handling in viewfile.php
    Examine the viewfile.php source code and look for the 'root' parameter usage, specifically checking if it is used directly in SQL queries without proper sanitization, prepared statements, or parameterized queries.
    Affected if The 'root' parameter is processed without sanitization or prepared statements and is used in SQL queries.
  5. Check authentication requirement for viewfile.php
    Attempt to access viewfile.php without logging in, or review the authentication logic at the beginning of viewfile.php to determine if unauthenticated access is possible.
    Affected if Unauthenticated access to viewfile.php is possible, though the CVE states authenticated users are required (this may indicate an even wider attack surface).

A user is affected if b2evolution CMS version 4.1.3 is installed, viewfile.php exists, and the 'root' parameter is handled without sanitization or prepared statements in SQL queries.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of b2evolution; if unavailable, implement prepared statements/parameterized queries for the root parameter in viewfile.php.

Fix this in B2evolution Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5910 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5910 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data