CVE-2012-5961
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStack-based buffer overflow in the unique_service_name function in ssdp/ssdp_server.c in the SSDP parser in the portable SDK for UPnP Devices (aka libupnp, formerly the Intel SDK for UPnP devices) 1.3.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long UDN (aka device) field in a UDP packet.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow exists in the unique_service_name function within ssdp/ssdp_server.c of the libupnp 1.3.1 SSDP parser. The vulnerability occurs when processing UDP packets containing an overly long UDN (device) field, which is copied into a fixed-size stack buffer without proper bounds checking, enabling remote arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.3.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed libupnp versionRun 'pkg-config --modversion libupnp' or check the library file version with 'dpkg -l libupnp' (Debian) or 'rpm -q libupnp' (RHEL). If using embedded devices, consult device firmware documentation or banner-grab the SSDP service on port 1900.Affected if The version is exactly 1.3.1 (unpatched)
-
Confirm SSDP server component is loadedInspect the application or service using libupnp. Look for processes that link against libupnp with 'ldd <process>' or check if the binary references ssdp_server.c functionality. For embedded devices, review the firmware components listing.Affected if The application links against the vulnerable libupnp library and utilizes the SSDP parsing functionality
-
Verify UDP port 1900 is accessibleRun 'netstat -anu | grep 1900' or 'ssdp -uan | grep 1900' to check if the SSDP multicast port is listening. For remote checks, use 'nmap -sU -p 1900 <target>' to probe UDP 1900.Affected if UDP port 1900 is open and accepting SSDP packets from untrusted networks
-
Inspect SSDP response for UDN field lengthSend an SSDP M-SEARCH request (e.g., using 'nc -u <target> 1900' with SSDP discovery payload) and examine the Location or USN headers for unusually long UDN values. A vulnerable server may reflect or accept arbitrarily long UDN strings.Affected if The service returns or processes UDN values that exceed typical lengths without truncation
A user is affected if they run libupnp version 1.3.1 with the SSDP server enabled and UDP port 1900 exposed to untrusted network input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade libupnp to a patched version (1.3.1a or later). If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict or block external access to UDP port 1900 (SSDP) at the network perimeter.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-5961 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sources- www.kb.cert.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- www.kb.cert.org
- www.securityfocus.com
- pupnp.sourceforge.net
- tools.cisco.com
- tsd.dlink.com.tw
- tsd.dlink.com.tw
- tsd.dlink.com.tw
- tsd.dlink.com.tw
- www.debian.org
- www.debian.org
- www.mandriva.com
- community.rapid7.com
- community.rapid7.com
- community.rapid7.com
- wiki.mageia.org
- nvd.nist.gov
Practitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-5961 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data