MoodleCMS

CVE-2012-6102

MEDIUM · 6.4 CVSS v2.0 Published 2013-01-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
73/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
lib.php in the Submission comments plugin in the Assignment module in Moodle 2.3.x before 2.3.4 and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to read or modify the submission comments (aka feedback comments) of arbitrary users via a crafted URI.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IDOR vulnerability in Moodle's Assignment module submission comments plugin (lib.php). The plugin fails to properly authorize access to submission comments, allowing remote attackers to read or modify feedback comments of arbitrary users via crafted URIs.

MitigationUpgrade to Moodle 2.3.4, 2.4.1, or later. Alternatively, apply the vendor patch to add proper authorization checks in the submission comments plugin.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MoodleCMS
Affected:= 2.3.0= 2.3.1= 2.3.2= 2.3.3= 2.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Authentication
None
Confidentiality
Partial
Integrity
Partial
Availability
None

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed Moodle version
    Log into Moodle as administrator and navigate to Site Administration > Server > Environment, or inspect the version.php file in the Moodle root directory. The version number is typically defined in a variable like $version or $release.
    Affected if The installed version matches 2.3.0, 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 2.3.3, or 2.4.0 exactly.
  2. Verify Assignment module is enabled
    Navigate to Site Administration > Plugins > Activity modules > Manage activities, or check the course where assignments are being used. Confirm the Assignment activity module is installed and enabled.
    Affected if The Assignment module is present and enabled in the Moodle installation.
  3. Confirm submission comments plugin is in use
    Check if any courses are using the Assignment activity with the comments feature enabled. This can be verified by creating or viewing an assignment and checking if comments functionality is accessible to students or teachers.
    Affected if The Assignment submission comments feature is accessible to users, meaning the submission comments plugin is active.
  4. Inspect vulnerable lib.php file
    Locate the file mod/assignment/submission/comments/lib.php in the Moodle installation directory. Examine the function that handles viewing or editing comments for proper capability checks. The vulnerability exists if the code lacks capability checks before allowing access to submission comments.
    Affected if The lib.php file exists and lacks proper authorization checks in the comment access functions.

A user is affected if their Moodle installation version is exactly 2.3.0 through 2.3.3 or 2.4.0, the Assignment module is enabled, and the submission comments plugin is in use, allowing unauthorized access to comments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to Moodle 2.3.4, 2.4.1, or later. Alternatively, apply the vendor patch to add proper authorization checks in the submission comments plugin.

Fix this in Moodle Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-6102 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-6102 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data