CVE-2012-6114
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe git-changelog utility in git-extras 1.7.0 allows local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack on (1) /tmp/changelog or (2) /tmp/.git-effort.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe git-changelog utility in git-extras 1.7.0 creates files in /tmp without proper symlink protection, allowing local users to overwrite arbitrary files by pre-creating symlinks at /tmp/changelog or /tmp/.git-effort pointing to target files. When the utility runs, it follows the symlink and writes to the attacker's chosen location.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if git-extras is installed and identify its versionRun 'git-extras --version' or check your package manager for the installed git-extras versionAffected if The installed version is 1.7.0 exactly, as this is the only affected version per the CVE details
-
Verify the git-changelog utility existsRun 'which git-changelog' or check if git-changelog is available in your PATHAffected if git-changelog exists and the version check above shows 1.7.0, confirming the vulnerable binary is present
-
Inspect /tmp for pre-existing symlinks to changelogRun 'ls -la /tmp/changelog /tmp/.git-effort 2>/dev/null' to check if these files exist and what type they areAffected if Either /tmp/changelog or /tmp/.git-effort exists as a symlink (shown by 'l' prefix in ls -la output), indicating active exploitation of this vulnerability
-
Examine the git-changelog source code for unsafe /tmp usageLocate the git-changelog script (typically in /usr/bin/git-changelog or via 'type git-changelog') and search for file writes to /tmp without O_EXCL or mkstemp()Affected if The script writes to /tmp/changelog or /tmp/.git-effort without using O_EXCL, mkstemp(), or symlink checks, confirming the vulnerable code pattern exists
You are affected if git-extras version 1.7.0 is installed and the git-changelog utility uses unsafe /tmp file creation, or if symlinks already exist in /tmp pointing to the vulnerable filenames.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUse safe file creation methods such as O_EXCL flag or mkstemp() when writing to /tmp, and verify the file is not a symlink before writing. Alternatively, avoid using predictable /tmp filenames and use securely generated temporary files.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-6114 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-6114 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data