CVE-2012-6599
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe device-management command-line interface in Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary commands via unspecified vectors, aka Ref ID 33476.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCommand injection vulnerability in the PAN-OS device-management CLI allows remote authenticated users to execute arbitrary operating system commands. The flaw affects PAN-OS 4.0.x before 4.0.8 and 4.1.x before 4.1.1. A CVSS score of 9 indicates network-exploitable, low-complexity attacks with complete system compromise potential.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.0.0= 4.0.1= 4.0.2= 4.0.3= 4.0.4= 4.0.5= 4.0.6= 4.0.7= 4.1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device is running PAN-OSAccess the device CLI or administrative web interface and run 'show system info' or check the device identification in the management interface to confirm the product is Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS.Affected if The device is not running PAN-OS (the vulnerability only affects PAN-OS).
-
Determine the PAN-OS versionRun the command 'show system info' in the PAN-OS CLI or check the version displayed in the web administrative interface under Device > Setup > Management.Affected if The installed version is 4.0.0, 4.0.1, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.0.4, 4.0.5, 4.0.6, 4.0.7, or 4.1.0 (any version before 4.0.8 in the 4.0.x branch or before 4.1.1 in the 4.1.x branch).
-
Verify the management interface is accessibleAttempt to reach the PAN-OS management interface via SSH on port 443 or 4433, or verify that the management IP is reachable from network segments. Check the management interface configuration with 'show interface management' in the CLI.Affected if The device management interface is reachable from untrusted networks (the flaw is exploitable by remote authenticated users).
-
Confirm administrative authentication is enabledCheck the authentication settings in the web interface under Device > Authentication Settings, or verify local admin accounts exist with 'show admins' in the CLI. Confirm that remote authentication (RADIUS, TACACS+, LDAP) is configured if applicable.Affected if Remote administrative access is enabled and users can authenticate to the device (the command injection requires authenticated access to the management CLI).
The environment is affected if the device runs PAN-OS versions 4.0.0 through 4.0.7 or 4.1.0 and has its management interface accessible for remote authenticated administrative access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade PAN-OS to version 4.0.8 or 4.1.1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict management interface access to trusted administrative networks only.
PAN-OS 4.0.8 or later (or PAN-4.1.1 or later for the 4.1 branch)
- 1. Download PAN-OS 4.0.8 or later (or 4.1.1 or later for the 4.1 branch) from the Palo Alto Networks support portal
- 2. Review the PAN-OS upgrade guide for your specific hardware model
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window as upgrades require downtime
- 4. Back up your current configuration
- 5. Upload the new PAN-OS image via the web interface or CLI
- 6. Perform the upgrade and verify the system boots successfully
- 7. Confirm the new version is running: > show system info
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2012-6599 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2012-6599 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data